A Software Engineer at RTI International plays a critical role in developing innovative software solutions that enhance the quality of data-driven research and policy analysis. This position is essential for ensuring that RTI's products meet the needs of various stakeholders, including governmental agencies, educational institutions, and nonprofit organizations. As a Software Engineer, you will contribute to projects that focus on public health, education, and environmental sustainability, making a tangible impact on society through technology. In this role, you will be involved in the full software development lifecycle, from requirements gathering to deployment and maintenance. You will work closely with cross-functional teams, including data scientists, project managers, and subject matter experts, to create robust applications that support RTI's mission. The complexity and scale of the projects you will undertake are both challenging and rewarding, offering you the opportunity to leverage modern technologies in a collaborative environment.
Phone Screen
reportedInitial screening call to assess candidate's fit for the role.
What to demonstrate
- Initial screening call to assess candidate's fit for the role
- Depth in C Programming
How to prepare
- Be able to walk your CV end to end in two minutes, and say why this company specifically.
- Have your salary expectations, notice period and location constraints ready, and ask for the rest of the loop in writing.
Technical Assessments
reportedSeries of interviews focusing on technical competencies relevant to the position.
What to demonstrate
- Series of interviews focusing on technical competencies relevant to the position
- Depth in C Programming
How to prepare
- Answer aloud and timed: Explain the differences between REST and SOAP APIs.
- Answer aloud and timed: What is your process for ensuring code quality and maintainability?
Behavioral Evaluations
reportedInterviews assessing cultural fit and behavioral competencies.
What to demonstrate
- Interviews assessing cultural fit and behavioral competencies
- Depth in C Programming
How to prepare
- Prepare three examples from your own work, each with a decision you made and an outcome you can quantify.
- Re-read the description of the behavioral evaluations above and write down what you would ask to confirm before it.
Team Interviews
reportedInterviews with team members and managers for comprehensive evaluation.
What to demonstrate
- Interviews with team members and managers for comprehensive evaluation
- Depth in C Programming
How to prepare
- Answer aloud and timed: How do you prioritize tasks when working on multiple projects?
- Answer aloud and timed: Give an example of how you’ve worked collaboratively with other team members.
Stakeholder Interviews
reportedPossible interviews with stakeholders from other departments.
What to demonstrate
- Possible interviews with stakeholders from other departments
- Depth in C Programming
How to prepare
- Answer aloud and timed: What motivates you to contribute to a team’s success?
- Answer aloud and timed: Explain a situation where you had to adapt to a significant change in a project.
PracHub editorial advice for the preparation topics above.
Prepare to Discuss Your Projects
Be ready to delve into the specifics of past projects, including your role, technologies used, and challenges faced.
Show Enthusiasm for RTI’s Mission
Express your interest in the meaningful work RTI does and how your skills align with their goals.
Practice Technical Questions
Use platforms like LeetCode or HackerRank to sharpen your coding skills and prepare for technical assessments.
Be Honest About Your Skills
If you encounter questions about unknown topics, it's better to be honest and express your willingness to learn.
Choose a category, try a prompt, then open its approach, worked solution or follow-up when you need it.
Write a function to find the longest substring without repeating characters.
Write a function to find the longest substring without repeating characters.
Approach
- Restate the input: its shape, its size, and what is guaranteed about it.
- Name the brute-force solution and its complexity before improving on it.
- Choose the data structure from the access pattern, not from familiarity.
- State the target complexity and say which constraint rules the naive version out.
Follow-up
- How does this change if the input no longer fits in memory?
- What is the worst case, and how likely is it on real data?
Given a sorted array, how would you implement a binary search algorithm?
Given a sorted array, how would you implement a binary search algorithm?
Approach
- Restate the input: its shape, its size, and what is guaranteed about it.
- Name the brute-force solution and its complexity before improving on it.
- Choose the data structure from the access pattern, not from familiarity.
- State the target complexity and say which constraint rules the naive version out.
Follow-up
- How does this change if the input no longer fits in memory?
- What is the worst case, and how likely is it on real data?
Explain the time and space complexity of your proposed solution.
Explain the time and space complexity of your proposed solution.
Approach
- Restate the input: its shape, its size, and what is guaranteed about it.
- Name the brute-force solution and its complexity before improving on it.
- Choose the data structure from the access pattern, not from familiarity.
- State the target complexity and say which constraint rules the naive version out.
Follow-up
- How does this change if the input no longer fits in memory?
- What is the worst case, and how likely is it on real data?
Hold a per-tenant active cap against concurrent creates
A tenant on the standard plan may hold at most 50 resources with status='active'. The create handler runs SELECT count(*) FROM resource WHERE tenant_id = $1 AND status = 'active', compares to 50, then inserts. Two creates arrive 3 ms apart on different instances and the tenant lands at 51. Name the anomaly, say whether PostgreSQL 16 READ COMMITTED or REPEATABLE READ prevents it and why, then give an implementation that holds the cap at READ COMMITTED with the exact statements. Finally, say what changes when the cap is 'at most one running export per tenant' on job_run.
Approach
- Name it: write skew. The two transactions read an overlapping set and write disjoint rows, so there is no row-level conflict for the engine to detect and each commit is individually legal.
- Rule out the levels precisely. READ COMMITTED takes a fresh snapshot per statement and takes no lock on the counted rows, so both see 49. PostgreSQL's REPEATABLE READ is snapshot isolation: it removes non-repeatable reads and phantoms within the snapshot but still admits write skew, because the anomaly is not a re-read of a changed row, it is a read of a set that a concurrent transaction invalidates. Only SERIALIZABLE closes it, by tracking the read dependency and aborting one transaction with SQLSTATE 40001 — a guarantee that exists only if the application re-runs the whole transaction from the read.
- Convert the set predicate into a single-row conflict: keep tenant.active_resource_count and run UPDATE tenant SET active_resource_count = active_resource_count + 1 WHERE tenant_id = $1 AND active_resource_count < 50 in the same transaction as the INSERT. Zero affected rows is the cap, returned as 409. The row lock serialises the decision at any isolation level, and contention is bounded to one tenant's row — which is also the fair-scheduling unit, unlike a global counter that would convoy every tenant behind one row.
- State the cost you just took on: a counter is a second source of truth that can drift, so every path that changes status must adjust it inside the same transaction, and a periodic reconciliation has to exist, with resource_revision as the authority for what the count should have been.
Follow-up
- A resource moves from archived back to active. Which statements change, and what breaks if the counter update and the status change land in different transactions?
- The cap becomes plan-dependent and a plan can change mid-month. Where does the number 50 live, and who reads it?
Find version gaps and relay lag with window functions
outbox_event holds event_id, aggregate_type, aggregate_id, aggregate_version, event_type, payload, status ('pending','published','dead'), attempts, created_at, published_at. A projection is missing rows and you must decide whether the relay skipped events or the consumer dropped them. Write three queries over the last seven days: one listing every aggregate_id whose published aggregate_version sequence has a hole, one giving per-day counts with a running total, and one returning the newest published event per aggregate. For each, say where the window function is evaluated relative to WHERE and LIMIT. PostgreSQL 16.
Approach
- Gaps: compute lead(aggregate_version) OVER (PARTITION BY aggregate_id ORDER BY aggregate_version) in a subquery, then filter next_version <> aggregate_version + 1 in the outer query. Window functions are evaluated after WHERE, GROUP BY and HAVING and before the outer ORDER BY and LIMIT, so the predicate cannot sit in the same WHERE clause and PostgreSQL 16 has no QUALIFY.
- Say what the seven-day filter does to the answer: it truncates every partition, so the first row per aggregate has no predecessor inside the window and a hole spanning the boundary is invisible. Widen the window, or join to resource.version as the authority for the true maximum.
- Running total: SELECT date_trunc('day', created_at) AS d, count() AS n, sum(count()) OVER (ORDER BY date_trunc('day', created_at) ROWS UNBOUNDED PRECEDING). An aggregate inside a window call is legal because grouping runs before windowing. The grouping key is unique per row here so ROWS and RANGE agree, but write the frame anyway — over ungrouped rows with tied timestamps the default RANGE frame pulls in every peer row and the total jumps.
- Newest per aggregate: DISTINCT ON (aggregate_id) ... ORDER BY aggregate_id, aggregate_version DESC is the cheap PostgreSQL-only form when an index matches that order; row_number() OVER (PARTITION BY aggregate_id ORDER BY aggregate_version DESC) = 1 is the portable form and needs a subquery for the same evaluation-order reason as the gap query.
Follow-up
- Relay failover redelivers events. Does a duplicate break the gap query, and how would you detect one from this table alone?
- Turn the gap check into a continuous monitor rather than a query someone runs after an incident. What does it watch?
Explain the differences between REST and SOAP APIs.
Explain the differences between REST and SOAP APIs.
Approach
- Say who the caller is and what they do when the call fails halfway.
- Define the identity of a request so a retry cannot double-apply it.
- Separate accepted, pending, failed and confirmed; they are different facts.
- Design the error taxonomy before the success shape; callers branch on it.
Follow-up
- What happens if the caller retries after a timeout?
- How does a client discover it is on an old version of this contract?
What is your process for ensuring code quality and maintainability?
What is your process for ensuring code quality and maintainability?
Approach
- Clarify what is being asked and what a complete answer contains.
- State your assumptions explicitly before working the problem.
- Say what you would check first and why it is the highest-information step.
- Work from the requirement backwards to the design.
Follow-up
- What assumption would you test first?
- How would you know your answer was wrong?
Can you discuss a project where you implemented a significant technical solution?
Can you discuss a project where you implemented a significant technical solution?
Approach
- Clarify what is being asked and what a complete answer contains.
- State your assumptions explicitly before working the problem.
- Say what you would check first and why it is the highest-information step.
- Work from the requirement backwards to the design.
Follow-up
- What assumption would you test first?
- How would you know your answer was wrong?
How would you approach designing a new feature for an existing application?
How would you approach designing a new feature for an existing application?
Approach
- Clarify what is being asked and what a complete answer contains.
- State your assumptions explicitly before working the problem.
- Say what you would check first and why it is the highest-information step.
- Work from the requirement backwards to the design.
Follow-up
- What assumption would you test first?
- How would you know your answer was wrong?
Describe a scenario where you had to analyze user feedback to improve a software product.
Describe a scenario where you had to analyze user feedback to improve a software product.
Approach
- Clarify what is being asked and what a complete answer contains.
- State your assumptions explicitly before working the problem.
- Say what you would check first and why it is the highest-information step.
- Work from the requirement backwards to the design.
Follow-up
- What assumption would you test first?
- How would you know your answer was wrong?
What metrics would you consider to evaluate the success of a software project?
What metrics would you consider to evaluate the success of a software project?
Approach
- Clarify what is being asked and what a complete answer contains.
- State your assumptions explicitly before working the problem.
- Say what you would check first and why it is the highest-information step.
- Work from the requirement backwards to the design.
Follow-up
- What assumption would you test first?
- How would you know your answer was wrong?
How do you approach debugging a complex software issue?
How do you approach debugging a complex software issue?
Approach
- Establish what changed and when, before forming any theory.
- Pick a bisection that eliminates candidates whichever way it turns out.
- Check the instrumentation before believing the symptom.
- Separate the trigger from the cause; the deploy is rarely the bug.
Follow-up
- What would you look at first, and what would it rule out?
- How would you tell a cause from a coincidence here?
Built from the rounds and topics RTI International candidates report.
Prepare, practise & reflect
One practical outcome each day. Spend longer where you need it.
0 / 7 done01Map the RTI International loop
- Write out the reported sequence: Phone Screen, Technical Assessments, Behavioral Evaluations, Team Interviews, Stakeholder Interviews.
- For each round, write one sentence on what it is judging, from the description above, and mark the one you are least ready for.
Deliverable: A one-page map of the 5 reported rounds, with the weakest marked.
02Work C Programming
- Spend the session on C Programming, which RTI International candidates report being tested on.
- Write one worked example in C Programming and time yourself on it.
Deliverable: One timed worked example in C Programming.
03Work Technical Questioning
- Spend the session on Technical Questioning, which RTI International candidates report being tested on.
- Write one worked example in Technical Questioning and time yourself on it.
Deliverable: One timed worked example in Technical Questioning.
04Work Online Technical Coding Assessment
- Spend the session on Online Technical Coding Assessment, which RTI International candidates report being tested on.
- Write one worked example in Online Technical Coding Assessment and time yourself on it.
Deliverable: One timed worked example in Online Technical Coding Assessment.
05Answer out loud: Technical / Domain Questions
- Answer aloud, timed: Describe your experience with [specific technology or programming language].
- Answer aloud, timed: How do you approach debugging a complex software issue?
Deliverable: Spoken answers to 2 reported Technical / Domain Questions question(s), under time.
06Answer out loud: Behavioral / Leadership
- Answer aloud, timed: Describe a time when you faced a significant challenge at work. How did you overcome it?
- Answer aloud, timed: How do you prioritize tasks when working on multiple projects?
Deliverable: Spoken answers to 2 reported Behavioral / Leadership question(s), under time.
07Answer out loud: Problem-Solving / Case Studies
- Answer aloud, timed: How would you approach designing a new feature for an existing application?
- Answer aloud, timed: Describe a scenario where you had to analyze user feedback to improve a software product.
Deliverable: Spoken answers to 2 reported Problem-Solving / Case Studies question(s), under time.
Expand any day for tasks and deliverables. Your progress is saved on this device.
Behavioural rounds judge the decision you made and what it cost.
Describe your experience with [specific technology or programming language].
Describe your experience with [specific technology or programming language].
Approach
- Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
- State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
- Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
- Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
- What would you do differently if you ran that again?
- How did you know your change caused the improvement?
Describe a time when you faced a significant challenge at work. How did you overcome it?
Describe a time when you faced a significant challenge at work. How did you overcome it?
Approach
- Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
- State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
- Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
- Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
- What would you do differently if you ran that again?
- How did you know your change caused the improvement?
How do you prioritize tasks when working on multiple projects?
How do you prioritize tasks when working on multiple projects?
Approach
- Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
- State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
- Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
- Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
- What would you do differently if you ran that again?
- How did you know your change caused the improvement?
Give an example of how you’ve worked collaboratively with other team members.
Give an example of how you’ve worked collaboratively with other team members.
Approach
- Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
- State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
- Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
- Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
- What would you do differently if you ran that again?
- How did you know your change caused the improvement?
What motivates you to contribute to a team’s success?
What motivates you to contribute to a team’s success?
Approach
- Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
- State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
- Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
- Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
- What would you do differently if you ran that again?
- How did you know your change caused the improvement?
Explain a situation where you had to adapt to a significant change in a project.
Explain a situation where you had to adapt to a significant change in a project.
Approach
- Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
- State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
- Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
- Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
- What would you do differently if you ran that again?
- How did you know your change caused the improvement?
- 01
Describe your experience with [specific technology or programming language].
- 02
Describe a time when you faced a significant challenge at work. How did you overcome it?
- 03
How do you prioritize tasks when working on multiple projects?
- 04
Give an example of how you’ve worked collaboratively with other team members.
What is the difficulty level of the interviews?
The interviews at RTI International are generally rated as average to slightly difficult. Candidates typically spend several weeks preparing, focusing on both technical and behavioral aspects.
RTI International Software Engineer candidate reports ↗How can I differentiate myself as a candidate?
Successful candidates often demonstrate a strong alignment with RTI's values, showcase relevant experience, and exhibit effective communication skills throughout the interview process.
RTI International Software Engineer candidate reports ↗What is the company culture like?
RTI International promotes a collaborative and supportive workplace, emphasizing integrity, teamwork, and a commitment to public service. Engineers are encouraged to innovate and contribute to meaningful projects.
RTI International Software Engineer candidate reports ↗How long does the interview process usually take?
From the initial screening to the final decision, the interview process can take several weeks. Stay proactive about following up with the hiring team for updates.
RTI International Software Engineer candidate reports ↗Are there remote work options available?
While some positions may offer remote flexibility, many roles encourage or require in-person collaboration, particularly for team-oriented projects.
RTI International Software Engineer candidate reports ↗What topics does RTI International test in interviews?
RTI International interviews most often cover Requirements Gathering, Behavioral Interviewing, Communication Skills, Behavioral interview skills, and Program Management. The exact emphasis depends on the specific role you apply for.
RTI International Software Engineer candidate reports ↗Sources & methodology 3 sources ↗
No official company page is cited. Rounds and questions come from candidate reports and PracHub editorial material; each source shows the date it was read.
- 01RTI International Software Engineer candidate reports ↗
Company-reported rounds, questions and FAQ.
Candidate reports · Accessed 2026-09-22 - 02PracHub Software Engineer practice ↗
PracHub practice material, not company-reported.
PracHub page · Accessed 2026-09-22 - 03PracHub preparation framework ↗
PracHub preparation guidance.
PracHub page · Accessed 2026-09-22
Explore related engineering environments and compare the preparation focus.
Cognition Software Engineer Interview Guide
What Cognition asks Software Engineer candidates, from reported rounds and questions.
Vercel Software Engineer Interview Guide
Debugging practice for Vercel software engineer prep built on a reproduction you trust, narrowing to the smallest failing input, and changing one variable per run so the result stays attributable.
Together Ai Software Engineer Interview Guide
Failure-handling practice for Together Ai software engineer candidates: requests whose outcome a timeout leaves unknown, where a retry is safe, and deduplicating at the receiver instead of assuming exactly-once delivery.
Spotify Software Engineer Interview Guide
Timed practice for Spotify software engineer candidates who lose time to the clock: short problems taken end to end, then reviewed against a written rubric rather than a passing test run.