A Software Engineer at Teco Westinghouse occupies a highly specialized and critical role at the intersection of physical power systems, advanced control theory, and embedded software. Unlike traditional software roles focused on high-level web applications, software engineering here is deeply intertwined with heavy industrial hardware, power electronics, and data center infrastructure. You will design, develop, and optimize the firmware and control algorithms that govern massive electric motors, variable frequency drives, and high-capacity power distribution systems. Your work directly impacts the reliability and efficiency of critical infrastructure around the globe. From engineering smart control systems for mega-scale data centers to optimizing the performance of high-voltage industrial generators, your code dictates physical behavior in real-time. Because a software failure in high-power environments can lead to catastrophic hardware damage or costly operational downtime, safety, determinism, and robust hardware-software co-design are at the forefront of every line of code you write. This role offers an intellectually stimulating environment for engineers who enjoy seeing their code control massive physical machines. You will collaborate closely with,, and to deliver unified, highly dependable systems.
HR Vetting Call
reportedInitial call to discuss your background, career goals, and alignment with the team's needs.
What to demonstrate
- Initial call to discuss your background, career goals, and alignment with the team's needs
- Depth in Hardware description languages (HDL)
How to prepare
- Answer aloud and timed: Explain the process of writing a state machine in Verilog or VHDL and how to prevent race conditions during state transitions.
- Answer aloud and timed: How do you handle clock domain crossing in a multi-clock FPGA design?
Technical Phone Screen
reportedOne-on-one phone or video discussion focusing on engineering principles and past design choices.
What to demonstrate
- One-on-one phone or video discussion focusing on engineering principles and past design choices
- Depth in Hardware description languages (HDL)
How to prepare
- Be able to walk your CV end to end in two minutes, and say why this company specifically.
- Have your salary expectations, notice period and location constraints ready, and ask for the rest of the loop in writing.
Practical Assessment
reportedHalf-day project-based test involving review of board layout or writing a functional module in Verilog or VHDL.
What to demonstrate
- Half-day project-based test involving review of board layout or writing a functional module in Verilog or VHDL
- Depth in Hardware description languages (HDL)
How to prepare
- Answer aloud and timed: Describe how you would debug a timing violation in a VHDL synthesis report.
- Answer aloud and timed: During a board layout review, what critical steps do you take to isolate sensitive analog control lines from high-noise switching components?
In-Person Interview
reportedIntensive interview at the Round Rock or Austin facility, presenting technical solutions and engaging in system-design discussions.
What to demonstrate
- Intensive interview at the Round Rock or Austin facility, presenting technical solutions and engaging in system-design discussions
- Depth in Hardware description languages (HDL)
How to prepare
- Answer aloud and timed: How does parasitic inductance in a PCB layout affect the switching characteristics of power MOSFETs, and how do you compensate for this in software?
- Answer aloud and timed: Explain how you would diagnose a suspected signal integrity issue on a high-speed communication bus.
PracHub editorial advice for the preparation topics above.
Showcase Your Lab Experience
Do not hesitate to talk about your hands-on laboratory experiences. Mentioning your familiarity with specific test equipment, physical debugging techniques, and safety protocols carries significant weight.
Prepare for the "Colloquium" Style
Expect long, deep discussions about engineering principles rather than rapid-fire technical trivia. Be ready to explain your design philosophy, defend your engineering choices, and listen constructively to alternative viewpoints.
Emphasize Safety
In high-power systems engineering, safety is a core value. Whenever you describe your past projects or solve hypothetical design problems, explicitly mention how you incorporated fail-safes, fault detection, and safety margins into your software.
Choose a category, try a prompt, then open its approach, worked solution or follow-up when you need it.
Explain the process of writing a state machine in Verilog or VHDL and how to prevent race conditions during st
Explain the process of writing a state machine in Verilog or VHDL and how to prevent race conditions during state transitions.
Approach
- Say what the runtime actually does before reasoning about the code.
- Name what is shared across threads and what owns each piece of state.
- Identify the window where an invariant is briefly untrue.
- Distinguish a value from a reference to it, and say which one you handed out.
Follow-up
- What happens if two callers reach this at the same time?
- Where could this allocate more than you expect?
How do you handle clock domain crossing in a multi-clock FPGA design?
How do you handle clock domain crossing in a multi-clock FPGA design?
Approach
- Say what the runtime actually does before reasoning about the code.
- Name what is shared across threads and what owns each piece of state.
- Identify the window where an invariant is briefly untrue.
- Distinguish a value from a reference to it, and say which one you handed out.
Follow-up
- What happens if two callers reach this at the same time?
- Where could this allocate more than you expect?
Walk me through how you would write a driver to communicate with an external ADC over an SPI interface.
Walk me through how you would write a driver to communicate with an external ADC over an SPI interface.
Approach
- Say what the runtime actually does before reasoning about the code.
- Name what is shared across threads and what owns each piece of state.
- Identify the window where an invariant is briefly untrue.
- Distinguish a value from a reference to it, and say which one you handed out.
Follow-up
- What happens if two callers reach this at the same time?
- Where could this allocate more than you expect?
What are the trade-offs between implementing a control loop in dedicated hardware (FPGA) versus software (micr
What are the trade-offs between implementing a control loop in dedicated hardware (FPGA) versus software (microcontroller/DSP)?
Approach
- Say what the runtime actually does before reasoning about the code.
- Name what is shared across threads and what owns each piece of state.
- Identify the window where an invariant is briefly untrue.
- Distinguish a value from a reference to it, and say which one you handed out.
Follow-up
- What happens if two callers reach this at the same time?
- Where could this allocate more than you expect?
Find version gaps and relay lag with window functions
outbox_event holds event_id, aggregate_type, aggregate_id, aggregate_version, event_type, payload, status ('pending','published','dead'), attempts, created_at, published_at. A projection is missing rows and you must decide whether the relay skipped events or the consumer dropped them. Write three queries over the last seven days: one listing every aggregate_id whose published aggregate_version sequence has a hole, one giving per-day counts with a running total, and one returning the newest published event per aggregate. For each, say where the window function is evaluated relative to WHERE and LIMIT. PostgreSQL 16.
Approach
- Gaps: compute lead(aggregate_version) OVER (PARTITION BY aggregate_id ORDER BY aggregate_version) in a subquery, then filter next_version <> aggregate_version + 1 in the outer query. Window functions are evaluated after WHERE, GROUP BY and HAVING and before the outer ORDER BY and LIMIT, so the predicate cannot sit in the same WHERE clause and PostgreSQL 16 has no QUALIFY.
- Say what the seven-day filter does to the answer: it truncates every partition, so the first row per aggregate has no predecessor inside the window and a hole spanning the boundary is invisible. Widen the window, or join to resource.version as the authority for the true maximum.
- Running total: SELECT date_trunc('day', created_at) AS d, count() AS n, sum(count()) OVER (ORDER BY date_trunc('day', created_at) ROWS UNBOUNDED PRECEDING). An aggregate inside a window call is legal because grouping runs before windowing. The grouping key is unique per row here so ROWS and RANGE agree, but write the frame anyway — over ungrouped rows with tied timestamps the default RANGE frame pulls in every peer row and the total jumps.
- Newest per aggregate: DISTINCT ON (aggregate_id) ... ORDER BY aggregate_id, aggregate_version DESC is the cheap PostgreSQL-only form when an index matches that order; row_number() OVER (PARTITION BY aggregate_id ORDER BY aggregate_version DESC) = 1 is the portable form and needs a subquery for the same evaluation-order reason as the gap query.
Follow-up
- Relay failover redelivers events. Does a duplicate break the gap query, and how would you detect one from this table alone?
- Turn the gap check into a continuous monitor rather than a query someone runs after an incident. What does it watch?
Keep soft-deleted accounts from blocking re-registration
app_user holds user_id, tenant_id, email CITEXT, password_hash (NULL for SSO principals), email_verified_at, auth_version, status ('invited','active','suspended','deactivated'), created_at, updated_at, deleted_at. Two live accounts for one address inside a tenant must be impossible, but an address freed by a soft delete must be reusable, and the same tenant may delete and re-register it repeatedly. Write the uniqueness DDL for PostgreSQL 16, then the equivalent for MySQL 8 where partial indexes do not exist, and say what each permits once three deleted rows already hold that address.
Approach
- Start from what is actually unique: not (tenant_id, email), but (tenant_id, email) among live rows. PostgreSQL says that directly — CREATE UNIQUE INDEX app_user_live_email ON app_user (tenant_id, email) WHERE deleted_at IS NULL. A full constraint over the same two columns burns the address permanently the first time someone deletes an account.
- Keep case-insensitivity in the type or the index, never in the application: CITEXT as given, or UNIQUE (tenant_id, lower(email)) as an expression index where the extension is unavailable. A case-sensitive unique column is exactly how two accounts for one human appear.
- For MySQL 8 the predicate has to move inside the key: add a discriminator column that is a constant 0 while the row is live and is set to user_id on delete, with UNIQUE (tenant_id, email, deleted_marker). Live rows share the constant and still collide; deleted rows differ from each other and stop colliding.
- State the NULL variant and its dependency: leaving the marker NULL for deleted rows also works, because a unique index treats NULLs as distinct — true in MySQL, and true in PostgreSQL only under the default NULLS DISTINCT, which PostgreSQL 15 lets you reverse. Check the polarity against the three existing deleted rows: constant-on-live is what preserves the collision you want, and reversing it silently admits duplicate live accounts.
Follow-up
- A deleted account re-registers with the same address the next day. Do the old resource rows follow the new user_id, and how does the API keep the two principals apart?
- How do you honour an erasure request while resource_revision.actor_user_id still references this table?
During a board layout review, what critical steps do you take to isolate sensitive analog control lines from h
During a board layout review, what critical steps do you take to isolate sensitive analog control lines from high-noise switching components?
Approach
- Clarify what is being asked and what a complete answer contains.
- State your assumptions explicitly before working the problem.
- Say what you would check first and why it is the highest-information step.
- Work from the requirement backwards to the design.
Follow-up
- What assumption would you test first?
- How would you know your answer was wrong?
How does parasitic inductance in a PCB layout affect the switching characteristics of power MOSFETs, and how d
How does parasitic inductance in a PCB layout affect the switching characteristics of power MOSFETs, and how do you compensate for this in software?
Approach
- Clarify what is being asked and what a complete answer contains.
- State your assumptions explicitly before working the problem.
- Say what you would check first and why it is the highest-information step.
- Work from the requirement backwards to the design.
Follow-up
- What assumption would you test first?
- How would you know your answer was wrong?
Explain how you would diagnose a suspected signal integrity issue on a high-speed communication bus.
Explain how you would diagnose a suspected signal integrity issue on a high-speed communication bus.
Approach
- Clarify what is being asked and what a complete answer contains.
- State your assumptions explicitly before working the problem.
- Say what you would check first and why it is the highest-information step.
- Work from the requirement backwards to the design.
Follow-up
- What assumption would you test first?
- How would you know your answer was wrong?
What key parameters do you look for when analyzing an oscilloscope capture of a noisy SPI data line?
What key parameters do you look for when analyzing an oscilloscope capture of a noisy SPI data line?
Approach
- Clarify what is being asked and what a complete answer contains.
- State your assumptions explicitly before working the problem.
- Say what you would check first and why it is the highest-information step.
- Work from the requirement backwards to the design.
Follow-up
- What assumption would you test first?
- How would you know your answer was wrong?
Explain the difference between scalar control (V/Hz) and vector control (Field Oriented Control) in AC inducti
Explain the difference between scalar control (V/Hz) and vector control (Field Oriented Control) in AC induction motors.
Approach
- Clarify what is being asked and what a complete answer contains.
- State your assumptions explicitly before working the problem.
- Say what you would check first and why it is the highest-information step.
- Work from the requirement backwards to the design.
Follow-up
- What assumption would you test first?
- How would you know your answer was wrong?
How do you mathematically model and tune a PID controller for a system with significant thermal inertia?
How do you mathematically model and tune a PID controller for a system with significant thermal inertia?
Approach
- Clarify what is being asked and what a complete answer contains.
- State your assumptions explicitly before working the problem.
- Say what you would check first and why it is the highest-information step.
- Work from the requirement backwards to the design.
Follow-up
- What assumption would you test first?
- How would you know your answer was wrong?
Walk us through the operating principles of a three-phase inverter and how space vector pulse width modulation
Walk us through the operating principles of a three-phase inverter and how space vector pulse width modulation (SVPWM) is used to control it.
Approach
- Clarify what is being asked and what a complete answer contains.
- State your assumptions explicitly before working the problem.
- Say what you would check first and why it is the highest-information step.
- Work from the requirement backwards to the design.
Follow-up
- What assumption would you test first?
- How would you know your answer was wrong?
How do you approach designing system architecture when the hardware specifications are still highly fluid or i
How do you approach designing system architecture when the hardware specifications are still highly fluid or incomplete?
Approach
- Fix the scope first: who calls this, how often, and what they do when it fails.
- Name the read and write paths separately; they rarely have the same bottleneck.
- Choose a partition key and say what query it makes expensive.
- State the consistency you need, and where you are willing to be stale.
Follow-up
- What breaks first when traffic grows ten times?
- How does this behave when that dependency is down for an hour?
Describe how you would debug a timing violation in a VHDL synthesis report.
Describe how you would debug a timing violation in a VHDL synthesis report.
Approach
- Establish what changed and when, before forming any theory.
- Pick a bisection that eliminates candidates whichever way it turns out.
- Check the instrumentation before believing the symptom.
- Separate the trigger from the cause; the deploy is rarely the bug.
Follow-up
- What would you look at first, and what would it rule out?
- How would you tell a cause from a coincidence here?
Built from the rounds and topics Teco Westinghouse candidates report.
Prepare, practise & reflect
One practical outcome each day. Spend longer where you need it.
0 / 7 done01Map the Teco Westinghouse loop
- Write out the reported sequence: HR Vetting Call, Technical Phone Screen, Practical Assessment, In-Person Interview.
- For each round, write one sentence on what it is judging, from the description above, and mark the one you are least ready for.
Deliverable: A one-page map of the 4 reported rounds, with the weakest marked.
02Work Hardware description languages (HDL)
- Spend the session on Hardware description languages (HDL), which Teco Westinghouse candidates report being tested on.
- Write one worked example in Hardware description languages (HDL) and time yourself on it.
Deliverable: One timed worked example in Hardware description languages (HDL).
03Work Verilog
- Spend the session on Verilog, which Teco Westinghouse candidates report being tested on.
- Write one worked example in Verilog and time yourself on it.
Deliverable: One timed worked example in Verilog.
04Work VHDL
- Spend the session on VHDL, which Teco Westinghouse candidates report being tested on.
- Write one worked example in VHDL and time yourself on it.
Deliverable: One timed worked example in VHDL.
05Answer out loud: Embedded Systems & Hardware Description Languages (HDL)
- Answer aloud, timed: Explain the process of writing a state machine in Verilog or VHDL and how to prevent race conditions during state transitions.
- Answer aloud, timed: How do you handle clock domain crossing in a multi-clock FPGA design?
Deliverable: Spoken answers to 2 reported Embedded Systems & Hardware Description Languages (HDL) question(s), under time.
06Answer out loud: Board Layout & Hardware Co-Design
- Answer aloud, timed: During a board layout review, what critical steps do you take to isolate sensitive analog control lines from high-noise switching components?
- Answer aloud, timed: How does parasitic inductance in a PCB layout affect the switching characteristics of power MOSFETs, and how do you compensate for this in software?
Deliverable: Spoken answers to 2 reported Board Layout & Hardware Co-Design question(s), under time.
07Answer out loud: Power Electronics & Control Systems Principles
- Answer aloud, timed: Explain the difference between scalar control (V/Hz) and vector control (Field Oriented Control) in AC induction motors.
- Answer aloud, timed: How do you mathematically model and tune a PID controller for a system with significant thermal inertia?
Deliverable: Spoken answers to 2 reported Power Electronics & Control Systems Principles question(s), under time.
Expand any day for tasks and deliverables. Your progress is saved on this device.
Behavioural rounds judge the decision you made and what it cost.
How do you handle anti-windup in an integral controller when the actuator reaches saturation?
How do you handle anti-windup in an integral controller when the actuator reaches saturation?
Approach
- Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
- State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
- Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
- Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
- What would you do differently if you ran that again?
- How did you know your change caused the improvement?
Describe a time you disagreed with a hardware engineer regarding whether a system failure was caused by a soft
Describe a time you disagreed with a hardware engineer regarding whether a system failure was caused by a software bug or a physical component defect. How did you resolve it?
Approach
- Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
- State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
- Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
- Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
- What would you do differently if you ran that again?
- How did you know your change caused the improvement?
Tell me about a complex technical problem you solved where you had to rely purely on first-principles physics
Tell me about a complex technical problem you solved where you had to rely purely on first-principles physics rather than documentation or standard procedures.
Approach
- Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
- State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
- Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
- Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
- What would you do differently if you ran that again?
- How did you know your change caused the improvement?
- 01
How do you handle anti-windup in an integral controller when the actuator reaches saturation?
- 02
Describe a time you disagreed with a hardware engineer regarding whether a system failure was caused by a software bug or a physical component defect. How did you resolve it?
- 03
Tell me about a complex technical problem you solved where you had to rely purely on first-principles physics rather than documentation or standard procedures.
How long does the entire interview process take?
The process typically takes between three to six weeks from the initial HR screen to a final offer. This timeline depends on scheduling availability for the half-day project-based test and the subsequent in-person interview.
Teco Westinghouse Software Engineer candidate reports ↗What is the dress code for the in-person interview?
Business casual is highly recommended. Because you may visit active engineering labs or testing facilities during your onsite visit, ensure you wear closed-toe shoes and avoid loose clothing or accessories.
Teco Westinghouse Software Engineer candidate reports ↗Is there a strong emphasis on coding style in the VHDL/Verilog test?
Yes. While functionality is critical, the engineering team highly values clean, well-commented, and synthesizable code. They look for structured state machines, proper signal naming conventions, and clear separation of clock domains.
Teco Westinghouse Software Engineer candidate reports ↗How much of the work is remote versus onsite?
Due to the hands-on nature of hardware integration, testing, and lab validation, this role typically requires a consistent onsite presence at the Round Rock, TX or Austin, TX facilities. Remote work is generally limited to pure software design or simulation phases.
Teco Westinghouse Software Engineer candidate reports ↗What topics does Teco Westinghouse test in interviews?
Teco Westinghouse interviews most often cover Medium Voltage / Low Voltage (MV/LV) Power Distribution Roadmapping, Hardware description languages (HDL), Power Distribution Equipment Product Management, Project Management (Concept to Shipment), and Verilog. The exact emphasis depends on the specific role you apply for.
Teco Westinghouse Software Engineer candidate reports ↗Sources & methodology 3 sources ↗
No official company page is cited. Rounds and questions come from candidate reports and PracHub editorial material; each source shows the date it was read.
- 01Teco Westinghouse Software Engineer candidate reports ↗
Company-reported rounds, questions and FAQ.
Candidate reports · Accessed 2026-09-22 - 02PracHub Software Engineer practice ↗
PracHub practice material, not company-reported.
PracHub page · Accessed 2026-09-22 - 03PracHub preparation framework ↗
PracHub preparation guidance.
PracHub page · Accessed 2026-09-22
Explore related engineering environments and compare the preparation focus.
Cognition Software Engineer Interview Guide
What Cognition asks Software Engineer candidates, from reported rounds and questions.
Vercel Software Engineer Interview Guide
Debugging practice for Vercel software engineer prep built on a reproduction you trust, narrowing to the smallest failing input, and changing one variable per run so the result stays attributable.
Together Ai Software Engineer Interview Guide
Failure-handling practice for Together Ai software engineer candidates: requests whose outcome a timeout leaves unknown, where a retry is safe, and deduplicating at the receiver instead of assuming exactly-once delivery.
Spotify Software Engineer Interview Guide
Timed practice for Spotify software engineer candidates who lose time to the clock: short problems taken end to end, then reviewed against a written rubric rather than a passing test run.