The Huntington · Software Engineer
Updated · 2026-10-02

The Huntington Software Engineer
Interview Guide

THE 60-SECOND BRIEF

As a Software Engineer at The Huntington, you are a pivotal contributor to the bank’s digital transformation and financial infrastructure. You will be tasked with building, maintaining, and scaling high-performance applications that impact millions of customers, ensuring that our digital banking platforms remain secure, reliable, and user-centric. Your work bridges the gap between complex financial requirements and seamless, intuitive technology. This role requires a blend of deep technical proficiency and a strategic mindset. You will work within agile, cross-functional teams to solve challenging architectural problems, optimize system performance, and deliver robust code. Whether you are working on backend services, cloud integrations, or customer-facing applications, your contributions directly influence the stability and innovation of The Huntington’s technological ecosystem.

This guide is scoped to a Software Engineer candidate at The Huntington.

The Huntington candidates report 3 rounds over 3-5 weeks. The stages below are what candidates describe, not a published process.

Technical interview preparationCoding challenge executionResume and project walkthroughs

21 min read

Browse Software Engineer questions

See the practice prompts

16Practice promptsAcross five skill areas

As a Software Engineer at The Huntington, you are a pivotal contributor to the bank’s digital transformation and financial infrastructure. You will be tasked with building, maintaining, and scaling high-performance applications that impact millions of customers, ensuring that our digital banking platforms remain secure, reliable, and user-centric. Your work bridges the gap between complex financial requirements and seamless, intuitive technology. This role requires a blend of deep technical proficiency and a strategic mindset. You will work within agile, cross-functional teams to solve challenging architectural problems, optimize system performance, and deliver robust code. Whether you are working on backend services, cloud integrations, or customer-facing applications, your contributions directly influence the stability and innovation of The Huntington’s technological ecosystem. ##### Tip Be prepared to discuss your past projects in great detail. Interviewers often drill down into the specific architectural decisions you made, the trade-offs you considered, and the technical outcomes of your work.

01

Initial Screening

reported

The first step involves an initial screening to assess your basic qualifications and fit for the role.

What to demonstrate

  • The first step involves an initial screening to assess your basic qualifications and fit for the role
  • Depth in Technical interview preparation

How to prepare

  • Be able to walk your CV end to end in two minutes, and say why this company specifically.
  • Have your salary expectations, notice period and location constraints ready, and ask for the rest of the loop in writing.
The Huntington Software Engineer candidate reports ↗
02

Technical Assessments

reported

Candidates undergo one or more rounds of deeper technical evaluations to assess their technical capabilities.

What to demonstrate

  • Candidates undergo one or more rounds of deeper technical evaluations to assess their technical capabilities
  • Depth in Technical interview preparation

How to prepare

  • Answer aloud and timed: How do you approach optimizing code performance for high-traffic applications?
  • Answer aloud and timed: Can you explain how you handle data storage and retrieval in your applications?
The Huntington Software Engineer candidate reports ↗
03

Behavioral Assessments

reported

Behavioral interviews focus on conversational and resume-based discussions to evaluate cultural fit.

What to demonstrate

  • Behavioral interviews focus on conversational and resume-based discussions to evaluate cultural fit
  • Depth in Technical interview preparation

How to prepare

  • Prepare three examples from your own work, each with a decision you made and an outcome you can quantify.
  • Re-read the description of the behavioral assessments above and write down what you would ask to confirm before it.
The Huntington Software Engineer candidate reports ↗

PracHub editorial advice for the preparation topics above.

01

Own your resume

Every line on your resume is fair game. If you list a project, be prepared to explain the technical details of its implementation in depth.

02

Stay professional under pressure

Even if an interviewer challenges you or a technical question seems difficult, maintain a calm, professional, and collaborative demeanor.

03

Ask meaningful questions

Use your time at the end of the interview to ask about the team’s current technical roadmap or how they handle cross-functional collaboration.

04

Be prepared for technical depth

Do not be surprised if an interviewer drills down into granular detail; treat it as an opportunity to show your mastery of the subject matter.

Choose a category, try a prompt, then open its approach, worked solution or follow-up when you need it.

11 technical prompts0 include a worked solution

Diff a projection against the primary without per-row point reads

hard
reconciliationrange hashingthrottling

The listing projection has drifted and some rows show a stale version. The primary holds 40,000,000 resource rows across 12,000 tenants while serving 1,200 writes and 14,000 reads per second. The obvious repair, reading each resource row and comparing its version against the projection, is correct and would eventually finish. Explain precisely why it is unacceptable here, then give a diff that finds the differing rows, state its complexity, and make it safe to run against a live primary. Replication lag is usually under 100 ms and is not bounded.

Approach
  1. Quantify the naive cost rather than calling it slow: 40,000,000 point reads at even 0.5 ms each is over five hours serialised, and the only lever is concurrency, which is exactly what you cannot spend. The primary's pool is sized for the write path, and 40,000,000 random reads evict the buffer cache that sustains the 85 percent cache hit rate, so the audit degrades the system it is auditing.
  2. Replace random access with one ordered pass per side. Both sides can be read in (tenant_id, resource_id) order, which is a sequential scan on each and a merge join in O(n) time and O(1) memory. For a dense diff that is the whole answer, and it reads the primary once instead of 40,000,000 times.
  3. For the expected sparse case, compare range hashes instead of rows: partition the key space, compute per range an order-independent aggregate over hash(resource_id, version), compare aggregates, and descend only into ranges that differ. With d differing rows and branching factor B, at most d ranges mismatch per level, so the drill-down examines O(d log_B(n/d)) ranges and reads full rows only in mismatching leaves.
  4. Aggregate with a sum modulo 2^64 or a multiset hash, never XOR. XOR is order-independent but self-cancelling, so two rows wrong in the same way, or a row duplicated on one side, leave the range aggregate matching and the range is declared clean.
Follow-up
  • The diff reports 900 stale rows. How do you decide between patching those rows and rebuilding the projection from resource_revision?
  • Same job, but the projection lives in a search index that cannot be scanned in key order. What changes?

Find overlapping job attempts and peak concurrency from lease records

medium
sweep lineintervalsleases

A day of job_run history yields about 50,000,000 attempt records: (job_run_id, job_type, attempt, started_at, finished_at which is NULL when the worker died, lease_expires_at). Leases expire on a clock, so a job that outran its lease ran twice. Produce (a) every job_run_id whose attempts overlapped in wall-clock time and (b) the peak number of simultaneously running attempts per job_type with the minute it occurred. Target O(n log n). State how you treat a NULL finished_at and what clock skew does to your answer.

Approach
  1. Define the interval before sorting anything: an attempt occupies [started_at, COALESCE(finished_at, lease_expires_at)). finished_at is observed and lease_expires_at is only a promise, so every attempt without a finish contributes an estimate and the whole result is a lower bound on overlap rather than an exact count.
  2. For peak concurrency, sweep: emit 2n endpoints, sort by (timestamp, kind) with ends ordered before starts at equal timestamps, then walk the sequence maintaining a counter per job_type and record each type's maximum with its timestamp. O(n log n) dominated by the sort, O(n) space, or O(1) extra if the sort is external and the walk streams.
  3. For overlap detection, do not compare attempts pairwise. A single global sort by (job_run_id, started_at) gives both the grouping and the order; within a group, keep the maximum end seen so far and report an overlap exactly when the next start is less than that running maximum, which is one linear pass after the sort.
  4. Half-open intervals matter and are easy to get wrong: with closed intervals an attempt ending at the same millisecond another begins reads as concurrency two, and across 50,000,000 records that artefact swamps the real signal.
Follow-up
  • A handler is not idempotent and you have found 400 overlapping jobs. Which of them actually caused damage, and what would you query to find out?
  • Peak concurrency for one job_type is 4 against a configured cap of 4. Is the cap working, or is the data hiding attempts that never started?

Track a rolling failure rate per destination for circuit decisions

easy
sliding windowring buffercircuit breaker

The egress service delivers about 1,500 webhooks per second across roughly 40,000 destinations, each call bounded by a 10 second timeout. Maintain, per destination, the failure rate over the trailing 60 seconds so a caller can ask before dispatch whether the circuit should open. Attempts arrive as (destination_id, finished_at_ms, outcome). Requirement: amortised O(1) per attempt, with total memory bounded by the destination count rather than by traffic. Give the structure, its exact memory, and the rule that stops a destination with three attempts from opening a circuit.

Approach
  1. Name the exact-deque version and then reject it as the default. Holding timestamps and advancing a tail pointer past anything older than now minus 60 seconds is a correct two-pointer window at amortised O(1) per attempt, but its memory tracks in-window traffic, so one destination in a retry storm holds hundreds of thousands of entries while thousands of quiet destinations hold none.
  2. Use a ring of 60 one-second buckets per destination, each bucket a pair of counters for attempts and failures. On an attempt, advance the ring by the elapsed whole seconds, zeroing at most min(elapsed, 60) buckets, then increment the head. That is amortised O(1) with a fixed footprint per destination.
  3. State the footprint: 60 buckets times two 4-byte counters is 480 bytes of payload per destination, so 40,000 destinations is roughly 20 to 25 MB with per-entry overhead, bounded by the catalogue rather than by the rate. The cost is granularity, since the oldest bucket ages out in whole seconds, which is far tighter than the decision needs.
  4. Require a minimum sample before the circuit may open. A destination with three attempts and three failures reads as 100 percent and is not evidence; a floor of roughly 20 attempts in the window makes the ratio meaningful, and below that floor use a run of consecutive failures as the trigger instead.
Follow-up
  • The fleet is 30 instances and each sees roughly a thirtieth of a destination's traffic. Where does the rate actually live, and what does a per-instance answer get wrong?
  • A destination answers in 9.5 seconds and succeeds. It is not failing but it is consuming your per-destination concurrency. What signal should open the circuit here?

Built from the rounds and topics The Huntington candidates report.

Small steps. Visible outcomes.0 / 7 completed
ONE WEEK · YOUR PACE

Prepare, practise & reflect

One practical outcome each day. Spend longer where you need it.

0 / 7 done
01Map the The Huntington loop
  • Write out the reported sequence: Initial Screening, Technical Assessments, Behavioral Assessments.
  • For each round, write one sentence on what it is judging, from the description above, and mark the one you are least ready for.

Deliverable: A one-page map of the 3 reported rounds, with the weakest marked.

02Work Technical interview preparation
  • Spend the session on Technical interview preparation, which The Huntington candidates report being tested on.
  • Write one worked example in Technical interview preparation and time yourself on it.

Deliverable: One timed worked example in Technical interview preparation.

03Work Coding challenge execution
  • Spend the session on Coding challenge execution, which The Huntington candidates report being tested on.
  • Write one worked example in Coding challenge execution and time yourself on it.

Deliverable: One timed worked example in Coding challenge execution.

04Work Resume and project walkthroughs
  • Spend the session on Resume and project walkthroughs, which The Huntington candidates report being tested on.
  • Write one worked example in Resume and project walkthroughs and time yourself on it.

Deliverable: One timed worked example in Resume and project walkthroughs.

05Answer out loud: Technical and Architectural Proficiency
  • Answer aloud, timed: Walk me through the architecture of the most complex project on your resume.
  • Answer aloud, timed: Why did you choose specific technologies or frameworks for your past initiatives?

Deliverable: Spoken answers to 2 reported Technical and Architectural Proficiency question(s), under time.

06Answer out loud: Behavioral and Cultural Alignment
  • Answer aloud, timed: Describe a time you had to explain a complex technical concept to a non-technical stakeholder.
  • Answer aloud, timed: How do you handle disagreements within your development team regarding technical direction?

Deliverable: Spoken answers to 2 reported Behavioral and Cultural Alignment question(s), under time.

07Dry run for The Huntington
  • Run one full mock under time, then write down the two questions you most want to ask your interviewers.

Deliverable: A completed timed mock and two questions to ask.

Expand any day for tasks and deliverables. Your progress is saved on this device.

Behavioural rounds judge the decision you made and what it cost.

Describe a time you had to explain a complex technical concept to a non-technical stakeholder.

medium
Behavioral and Cultural Alignment

Describe a time you had to explain a complex technical concept to a non-technical stakeholder.

Approach
  1. Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
  2. State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
  3. Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
  4. Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
  • What would you do differently if you ran that again?
  • How did you know your change caused the improvement?

How do you handle disagreements within your development team regarding technical direction?

medium
Behavioral and Cultural Alignment

How do you handle disagreements within your development team regarding technical direction?

Approach
  1. Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
  2. State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
  3. Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
  4. Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
  • What would you do differently if you ran that again?
  • How did you know your change caused the improvement?

Tell me about a time you had to pivot quickly due to shifting project requirements.

medium
Behavioral and Cultural Alignment

Tell me about a time you had to pivot quickly due to shifting project requirements.

Approach
  1. Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
  2. State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
  3. Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
  4. Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
  • What would you do differently if you ran that again?
  • How did you know your change caused the improvement?

What interests you about working in the financial services sector?

medium
Behavioral and Cultural Alignment

What interests you about working in the financial services sector?

Approach
  1. Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
  2. State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
  3. Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
  4. Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
  • What would you do differently if you ran that again?
  • How did you know your change caused the improvement?

How do you prioritize tasks when managing multiple competing deadlines?

medium
Behavioral and Cultural Alignment

How do you prioritize tasks when managing multiple competing deadlines?

Approach
  1. Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
  2. State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
  3. Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
  4. Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
  • What would you do differently if you ran that again?
  • How did you know your change caused the improvement?
  • 01

    Describe a time you had to explain a complex technical concept to a non-technical stakeholder.

  • 02

    How do you handle disagreements within your development team regarding technical direction?

  • 03

    Tell me about a time you had to pivot quickly due to shifting project requirements.

  • 04

    What interests you about working in the financial services sector?

PracHub preparation framework ↗
How long does the interview process typically take?

The timeline can vary, but most candidates experience a series of rounds over several weeks. Stay in regular contact with your recruiter to manage your expectations regarding the next steps.

The Huntington Software Engineer candidate reports ↗
Is the technical interview focused on whiteboard coding or practical application?

Expect a mix. While some rounds may involve coding exercises, others will be highly focused on your past projects and your ability to discuss architectural decisions in a real-world context.

The Huntington Software Engineer candidate reports ↗
What is the best way to stand out during the interview?

Demonstrate that you have done your research on The Huntington and show genuine curiosity about the team’s current technical challenges. Being able to communicate your technical choices with confidence is a strong differentiator.

The Huntington Software Engineer candidate reports ↗
What topics does The Huntington test in interviews?

The Huntington interviews most often cover Stakeholder Management, Problem Solving, Data Validation, Cross-Functional Collaboration, and Information Security (InfoSec). The exact emphasis depends on the specific role you apply for.

The Huntington Software Engineer candidate reports ↗
Sources & methodology 3 sources ↗

No official company page is cited. Rounds and questions come from candidate reports and PracHub editorial material; each source shows the date it was read.