Build a trusted, locally relevant COVID-19 guidance product for the public

Quick Overview

A product design case about building something that keeps the public accurately informed about COVID-19. It tests choosing target users, handling misinformation and fast-changing local guidance, prioritizing a first version, and defining metrics and guardrails for accuracy, reach and privacy.

Build a trusted, locally relevant COVID-19 guidance product for the public

Company: Google

Role: Product Manager

Category: Product Design & Strategy

Difficulty: medium

Interview Round: Other

You are asked to design a product that keeps people informed about the coronavirus that causes COVID-19. Explain whom it serves, what information it delivers and how, what goes into the first version, and how you would know it is working. ```hint Information is not what is scarce During an outbreak people face a flood of news, rumors and changing official advice. Think about what makes it hard for a person to act on that information, and for which people that is hardest. ``` ### Clarifying Questions - Is Google building this, so it can draw on Search, Maps, YouTube and Android, or is it a standalone product? - Which stage of the outbreak is it for: early spread when little is known, a peak with lockdowns, or a later phase with widespread testing? - Is the product limited to information, or are tools such as a symptom checker or exposure alerts in scope? - Which country and languages come first, given that rules differed by country and even by city? ### What a Strong Answer Covers - A goal framed around helping people make safe, correct decisions rather than consume more content, and a reasoned choice of target users. - Pain points specific to an outbreak: overload, conflicting and fast-changing guidance, misinformation, and advice that is not local or not in the person's language. - A prioritized first version that deals with source authority, freshness and local relevance, with trade-offs stated. - Metrics for reach, accuracy and usefulness, with guardrails for misinformation, privacy and needless alarm. - Risks such as being wrong at scale, giving what looks like medical advice, handling symptom or location data, and the people the product misses. ### Follow-up Questions - National and local health authorities give different advice. What does the product show? - How would you tell whether the product changed what people do, not just how many people looked at it? - Would you add alerts for people who were near someone who later tested positive? What privacy design would that need?

Overview: A product design case about building something that keeps the public accurately informed about COVID-19. It tests choosing target users, handling misinformation and fast-changing local guidance, prioritizing a first version, and defining metrics and guardrails for accuracy, reach and privacy.

Google logo
Google
May 11, 2024
mediumProduct ManagerOtherProduct Design & Strategy
0
0

You are asked to design a product that keeps people informed about the coronavirus that causes COVID-19. Explain whom it serves, what information it delivers and how, what goes into the first version, and how you would know it is working.

Clarifying Questions Guidance

  • Is Google building this, so it can draw on Search, Maps, YouTube and Android, or is it a standalone product?
  • Which stage of the outbreak is it for: early spread when little is known, a peak with lockdowns, or a later phase with widespread testing?
  • Is the product limited to information, or are tools such as a symptom checker or exposure alerts in scope?
  • Which country and languages come first, given that rules differed by country and even by city?

What a Strong Answer Covers Guidance

  • A goal framed around helping people make safe, correct decisions rather than consume more content, and a reasoned choice of target users.
  • Pain points specific to an outbreak: overload, conflicting and fast-changing guidance, misinformation, and advice that is not local or not in the person's language.
  • A prioritized first version that deals with source authority, freshness and local relevance, with trade-offs stated.
  • Metrics for reach, accuracy and usefulness, with guardrails for misinformation, privacy and needless alarm.
  • Risks such as being wrong at scale, giving what looks like medical advice, handling symptom or location data, and the people the product misses.

Follow-up Questions Guidance

  • National and local health authorities give different advice. What does the product show?
  • How would you tell whether the product changed what people do, not just how many people looked at it?
  • Would you add alerts for people who were near someone who later tested positive? What privacy design would that need?