Describe How You Assessed Code Quality and Added Tests

Describe a project where you assessed the quality of your code, implemented tests, or both. Explain what risks you were checking, how you chose the checks, what you found, and what changed as a result. ### Constraints & Assumptions - Use a real project and identify the code or tests you personally owned. - Distinguish passing tests from evidence that the tests cover the important behavior. - Explain any quality claim using an observable result; do not treat a coverage percentage as proof of correctness. ### Clarifying Questions to Ask - Would you prefer an example of designing tests or of using them to diagnose a defect? - Should I focus on a small component or on interactions across the application? ```hint Choose one failure that the original checks would have missed and explain why the improved checks could catch it. ``` ### What a Strong Answer Covers The answer should identify the behavior and failure risks, explain the chosen test boundaries and cases, and show how a result influenced the implementation or test strategy. Include the limits of the evidence and how the checks were kept repeatable. ### Follow-up Questions - What could still fail even if all your tests passed? - How did you avoid writing tests that merely repeated the implementation? - What would you do if a test failed intermittently?