Design an LLM math-solving chain

Q: Design an LLM math-solving chain

This question evaluates a candidate's ability to design LLM-driven arithmetic solving pipelines, covering decision policies for direct answers versus formula application versus code execution, orchestration and routing logic, tool integration and validation, prompting strategy, safety guardrails, evaluation metrics, and experiment tracking.

Q: How do I approach ML System Design interview questions?

ML System Design questions require understanding of core concepts and practice. PracHub provides solutions with explanations to help you master ml system design interviews.

Question

Design an LLM-Based Arithmetic Solver

Context

You are building an LLM-driven service that answers arithmetic questions ranging from simple expressions (e.g., 4 + 5) to queries like compute the sum from 1 to 100. The system must choose among answering directly, applying closed-form formulas, or executing code in a sandbox.

Requirements

Decision policy: when to answer directly vs use formulas vs run code (e.g., calculator, Python). Explain latency and accuracy trade-offs.
Chain logic: orchestration steps, routing, verification, and fallbacks.
Tool usage: which tools are available, how they are called, and how results are validated.
Prompting strategy: router prompts, solver prompts, output schema, and how to avoid leaking chain-of-thought.
Guardrails: safety, precision, ambiguity handling, timeouts, and injection defenses.
Evaluation: how to measure accuracy, test coverage, and reliability; how to handle errors and retries.
Experiment tracking: how you will version datasets, prompts, policies, and record metrics.

Provide concrete examples using 4 + 5 and sum from 1 to 100.

Design an LLM math-solving chain

Design an LLM-Based Arithmetic Solver

Context

Requirements

Solution

Comments (0)

Design an LLM math-solving chain

Overview

Design an LLM-Based Arithmetic Solver

Context

Requirements

Solution

Comments (0)