This question evaluates experiment design, causal inference, product-analytics, and metric-definition skills for multi-sided marketplaces, focusing on handling interference, spillovers, heterogeneity, and trade-offs between conversion, retention, credit burn, and monetization.
You are interviewing for a Data Scientist role at a food-delivery marketplace such as DoorDash. For each scenario below, explain how you would evaluate the change from an experimentation and product-analytics perspective.
For every scenario, discuss:
Assume the marketplace has three sides: customers, restaurants, and advertisers/sponsored listings. Unless you justify otherwise, assume metrics are measured over a 14-day post-exposure window and that experiments use sticky assignment.
Scenario A: Auto-apply customer credits at checkout Customers can use available credits when placing an order. Today they must manually choose to apply credits. The product team wants to change the checkout flow so that available credits are applied automatically by default.
Scenario B: Duplicate restaurant in search results In search, the top organic restaurant and the sponsored restaurant can sometimes be the same merchant, so the user sees two nearly identical listings on the same page.
Scenario C: Restaurant promotions Restaurants can currently create a fixed promotion such as 5 dollars off 30 dollars. The company is considering three related questions:
In Scenario C, consider both restaurant-side outcomes and customer-side outcomes. Discuss heterogeneity by restaurant size, cuisine, order volume, and new versus existing merchants. Also explain how you would separate incremental lift from cannibalization and adverse selection.