Evaluate Facebook's Restaurant Recommendations Feature Effectiveness

Quick Overview

Evaluates experiment design for restaurant recommendations inside a social feed. Strong answers define treatment, control, metrics, guardrails, power, rollout, and decision criteria while accounting for feed-health trade-offs.

Evaluate Facebook's Restaurant Recommendations Feature Effectiveness

Company: Meta

Role: Data Scientist

Category: Analytics & Experimentation

Difficulty: medium

Interview Round: Onsite

##### Scenario Facebook considering launching restaurant recommendations in the News Feed. ##### Question Design an experiment to evaluate the feature: define treatment, control, success metrics, guardrail metrics, sample-size approach, and rollout criteria. ##### Hints Focus on incremental engagement, CTR, downstream orders; watch for feed scroll depth and churn.

Overview: Evaluates experiment design for restaurant recommendations inside a social feed. Strong answers define treatment, control, metrics, guardrails, power, rollout, and decision criteria while accounting for feed-health trade-offs.

|Home/Analytics & Experimentation/Meta
Meta logo
Meta
Jul 12, 2025
mediumData ScientistOnsiteAnalytics & Experimentation
12
0

Experiment Design: Restaurant Recommendations in Facebook News Feed

Facebook is considering restaurant recommendation units inside News Feed, such as cards showing nearby restaurants with images, ratings, and a call to action. The product goal is to drive meaningful engagement and downstream restaurant activity without harming feed health.

Design an experiment to evaluate whether the feature should launch.

Constraints & Assumptions

  • Preserve causal interpretation by defining treatment, control, exposure, and randomization before looking at outcomes.
  • Avoid confounding the restaurant card with feed position, eligibility, geography, or supply availability.
  • Include both user-side outcomes and feed-health guardrails.
  • Make sample-size and rollout recommendations explicit enough for a production experiment review.

Clarifying Questions to Ask Guidance

  • Which markets and users are eligible for restaurant recommendations?
  • Is the module inserted in a fixed slot, ranked organically, or shown only when a restaurant candidate is available?
  • What downstream action is most valuable: click, save, order intent, reservation, or completed order?
  • Are restaurant partners, ad revenue, or local business outcomes part of the launch decision?

Part 1 - Treatment, Control, and Randomization

Define the experimental arms, the randomization unit, eligibility, and exposure logging.

What This Part Should Cover Guidance

  • Prefer user-level randomization with sticky assignment and intent-to-treat analysis.
  • Explain how control users are handled when the treatment would show a restaurant module.
  • Log eligibility, actual exposure, feed position, and module interactions.
  • Identify contamination risks such as cross-device behavior, marketplace supply limits, or shared social context.

Part 2 - Metrics and Guardrails

Define the primary success metric, secondary metrics, and guardrails.

What This Part Should Cover Guidance

  • Include restaurant-card engagement, downstream conversion, and durable user engagement where applicable.
  • Use feed-health guardrails such as hide/report, session quality, time spent quality, retention, and ad revenue.
  • Separate per-exposed metrics from user-level intent-to-treat metrics.
  • Include restaurant-side or merchant outcomes if the product decision depends on them.

Part 3 - Power, Duration, and Decisioning

Describe how you would size the experiment, run it safely, and decide whether to launch.

What This Part Should Cover Guidance

  • Estimate baseline rate, minimum detectable effect, variance, alpha, power, and maturation window.
  • Run SRM checks, logging checks, novelty checks, and ramp monitoring.
  • Define launch, iterate, or rollback thresholds before the experiment starts.
  • Consider segment reads by geography, user intent, supply density, and feed activity.

What a Strong Answer Covers Guidance

  • Provides a complete experiment plan rather than only listing metrics.
  • Shows awareness that ranking and placement can bias interpretation.
  • Balances restaurant-feature upside with feed health and platform revenue risks.
  • Uses clear decision criteria for mixed results.

Follow-up Questions Guidance

  • What would you do if clicks rise but long-term retention falls?
  • How would you analyze the feature if only a small share of treatment users actually see the module?
  • How would the design change if restaurants are also advertisers?
Loading comments...