Handle Difficult Feedback and Manager Disagreement

Quick Overview

Prepare four leadership stories covering difficult feedback, disagreement with a manager, committing to another person's direction, and a proud project. Strong responses show specific ownership, respectful judgment, measurable follow-through, honest trade-offs, and lessons without blame or inflated claims.

Handle Difficult Feedback and Manager Disagreement

Company: Roblox

Role: Software Engineer

Category: Behavioral & Leadership

Difficulty: medium

Interview Round: Technical Screen

Answer the following leadership questions with examples in which your choices materially affected the outcome. Do not reuse the same story unless the two lessons are genuinely different. ### Part 1: Deliver Difficult Feedback Describe a time you had to give hard feedback to a colleague. What behavior or result needed to change, how did you prepare, what did you say, and what happened afterward? #### What This Part Should Cover - Direct observation rather than hearsay - Private, specific, behavior-focused feedback - Listening and checking for missing context - A concrete follow-up agreement - Evidence of the later outcome ### Part 2: Disagree With a Manager Describe a substantive disagreement with your manager. Explain the shared goal, the evidence behind each view, how the decision was made, and how you acted after the decision. #### What This Part Should Cover - Respectful challenge with relevant data - Awareness of decision ownership - Commitment after a reasonable escalation path - A distinction between reversible and high-risk decisions ### Part 3: Follow Another Person's Direction Give an example in which you initially preferred a different approach but followed someone else's decision. Why was that the right choice, and what did you learn? #### What This Part Should Cover - Genuine disagreement without passive resistance - Support for execution after the decision - A feedback loop that could reveal whether the choice worked ### Part 4: Most Proud Project Discuss the project you are most proud of, emphasizing your contribution, the hardest trade-off, and why the outcome mattered. #### What This Part Should Cover - Personal ownership and collaboration - Technical depth tied to an outcome - Honest limitations and lessons ### What a Strong Answer Covers Strong answers show candor without blame, explain how judgment changed with evidence, and demonstrate that disagreement did not damage execution or trust. ### Follow-up Questions - What would the other person say about the interaction? - When would you escalate rather than commit? - Which result from the proud project was least certain at the start?

Quick Answer: Prepare four leadership stories covering difficult feedback, disagreement with a manager, committing to another person's direction, and a proud project. Strong responses show specific ownership, respectful judgment, measurable follow-through, honest trade-offs, and lessons without blame or inflated claims.

|Home/Behavioral & Leadership/Roblox
Roblox logo
Roblox
Jul 18, 2026, 12:00 AM
mediumSoftware EngineerTechnical ScreenBehavioral & Leadership
0
0

Answer the following leadership questions with examples in which your choices materially affected the outcome. Do not reuse the same story unless the two lessons are genuinely different.

Part 1: Deliver Difficult Feedback

Describe a time you had to give hard feedback to a colleague. What behavior or result needed to change, how did you prepare, what did you say, and what happened afterward?

What This Part Should Cover Guidance

  • Direct observation rather than hearsay
  • Private, specific, behavior-focused feedback
  • Listening and checking for missing context
  • A concrete follow-up agreement
  • Evidence of the later outcome

Part 2: Disagree With a Manager

Describe a substantive disagreement with your manager. Explain the shared goal, the evidence behind each view, how the decision was made, and how you acted after the decision.

What This Part Should Cover Guidance

  • Respectful challenge with relevant data
  • Awareness of decision ownership
  • Commitment after a reasonable escalation path
  • A distinction between reversible and high-risk decisions

Part 3: Follow Another Person's Direction

Give an example in which you initially preferred a different approach but followed someone else's decision. Why was that the right choice, and what did you learn?

What This Part Should Cover Guidance

  • Genuine disagreement without passive resistance
  • Support for execution after the decision
  • A feedback loop that could reveal whether the choice worked

Part 4: Most Proud Project

Discuss the project you are most proud of, emphasizing your contribution, the hardest trade-off, and why the outcome mattered.

What This Part Should Cover Guidance

  • Personal ownership and collaboration
  • Technical depth tied to an outcome
  • Honest limitations and lessons

What a Strong Answer Covers Guidance

Strong answers show candor without blame, explain how judgment changed with evidence, and demonstrate that disagreement did not damage execution or trust.

Follow-up Questions Guidance

  • What would the other person say about the interaction?
  • When would you escalate rather than commit?
  • Which result from the proud project was least certain at the start?
Loading comments...