PracHub
QuestionsPremiumCoachesLearningGuidesInterview Prep
|Home/Analytics & Experimentation/DoorDash

Investigate Falling Successful Orders in LA

Last updated: May 9, 2026

Quick Overview

This question evaluates marketplace data science competencies including metric validation, causal inference, funnel analysis, cross-side hypothesis generation (customer, driver/courier, and merchant), and experimental design within the Analytics & Experimentation / Data Science domain.

  • hard
  • DoorDash
  • Analytics & Experimentation
  • Data Scientist

Investigate Falling Successful Orders in LA

Company: DoorDash

Role: Data Scientist

Category: Analytics & Experimentation

Difficulty: hard

Interview Round: Technical Screen

DoorDash observes that the number of successful orders per day in the Los Angeles market has declined materially over the last 2 weeks relative to the prior 4-week baseline. Assume a **successful order** is an order that is placed, accepted, picked up, and delivered without cancellation. You are asked to investigate the problem as a marketplace data scientist. Please answer the following: 1. How would you validate the metric drop and distinguish between a true business decline vs. a logging, definition, or seasonality issue? 2. Propose at least one plausible hypothesis from each side of the marketplace: - Customer - Dasher - Restaurant 3. If all three sides appear to be contributing to the decline, how would you **quantify the impact of each hypothesis** rather than just listing possibilities? 4. How would you structure a funnel analysis for this problem? What metrics would you inspect at each stage, and how would you segment the analysis to avoid misleading conclusions from mix shifts or confounding? 5. Propose one or two product or operational improvements. 6. Choose one improvement and design an A/B test. Specify the experimental unit, primary metric, secondary/guardrail metrics, interference risks in a two-sided marketplace, and how you would think about power or MDE. You should explicitly discuss tradeoffs such as demand vs. fulfillment, short-term metric recovery vs. margin impact, and risks like Simpson’s paradox, selection bias, and marketplace spillovers.

Quick Answer: This question evaluates marketplace data science competencies including metric validation, causal inference, funnel analysis, cross-side hypothesis generation (customer, driver/courier, and merchant), and experimental design within the Analytics & Experimentation / Data Science domain.

Related Interview Questions

  • Evaluate Biker Feature Success - DoorDash (hard)
  • How would you test product changes? - DoorDash (hard)
  • How to test bike delivery? - DoorDash (medium)
  • Investigate LA successful orders drop - DoorDash (easy)
  • How would you diagnose a completed orders drop? - DoorDash (easy)
DoorDash logo
DoorDash
Dec 24, 2025, 12:00 AM
Data Scientist
Technical Screen
Analytics & Experimentation
3
0
Loading...

DoorDash observes that the number of successful orders per day in the Los Angeles market has declined materially over the last 2 weeks relative to the prior 4-week baseline.

Assume a successful order is an order that is placed, accepted, picked up, and delivered without cancellation. You are asked to investigate the problem as a marketplace data scientist.

Please answer the following:

  1. How would you validate the metric drop and distinguish between a true business decline vs. a logging, definition, or seasonality issue?
  2. Propose at least one plausible hypothesis from each side of the marketplace:
    • Customer
    • Dasher
    • Restaurant
  3. If all three sides appear to be contributing to the decline, how would you quantify the impact of each hypothesis rather than just listing possibilities?
  4. How would you structure a funnel analysis for this problem? What metrics would you inspect at each stage, and how would you segment the analysis to avoid misleading conclusions from mix shifts or confounding?
  5. Propose one or two product or operational improvements.
  6. Choose one improvement and design an A/B test. Specify the experimental unit, primary metric, secondary/guardrail metrics, interference risks in a two-sided marketplace, and how you would think about power or MDE.

You should explicitly discuss tradeoffs such as demand vs. fulfillment, short-term metric recovery vs. margin impact, and risks like Simpson’s paradox, selection bias, and marketplace spillovers.

Solution

Show

Submit Your Answer to Earn 20XP

Sign in to leave a comment

Loading comments...

Browse More Questions

More Analytics & Experimentation•More DoorDash•More Data Scientist•DoorDash Data Scientist•DoorDash Analytics & Experimentation•Data Scientist Analytics & Experimentation
PracHub

Master your tech interviews with 8,000+ real questions from top companies.

Product

  • Questions
  • Learning Tracks
  • Interview Guides
  • Resources
  • Premium
  • For Universities
  • Student Access

Browse

  • By Company
  • By Role
  • By Category
  • Topic Hubs
  • SQL Questions
  • Compare Platforms
  • Discord Community

Support

  • support@prachub.com
  • (916) 541-4762

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • About Us

© 2026 PracHub. All rights reserved.