Long-Range Google Product Bet: Making Face-to-Face Meetings Happen

Quick Overview

A product strategy interview prompt in which Google's CEO asks for a product that makes in-person meetings possible over the next five to ten years. It tests how a candidate interprets an ambiguous ask, picks a user segment, finds pain points, and lays out a phased roadmap with metrics and privacy risks.

Long-Range Google Product Bet: Making Face-to-Face Meetings Happen

Company: Google

Role: Product Manager

Category: Product Design & Strategy

Difficulty: medium

Interview Round: Other

Google's CEO asks you to create a product that makes in-person meetings possible, looking out over the next five to ten years. What would you build? ```hint Decide what "in person" means The ask can be read more than one way. Commit to a reading, say why it is the bigger opportunity for Google, then work out where getting people together breaks down today. ``` ### Clarifying Questions - Does "meetings in person" mean helping people physically get together, or making remote meetings feel as if everyone shares a room? - Are we focused on work meetings, such as hybrid teams and client visits, or also on friends and family? - Should the product extend Google products like Calendar, Maps and Meet, or can it be a new stand-alone product or device? - What does the CEO want from it over that horizon: Workspace growth, new revenue, or a new platform? ### What a Strong Answer Covers - A stated interpretation of the ask, a mission, and the long-term trend that makes it worth a five-to-ten-year bet - A chosen user segment with reasons, and the concrete points where meeting in person fails for that segment - A phased roadmap from a near-term product to the long-term vision, built on what Google already owns - Prioritization with explicit criteria, plus a success metric and guardrails - Risks, especially location privacy and workplace surveillance concerns, and how they shape the design ### Follow-up Questions - How would your answer change if the CEO meant technology that makes a remote meeting feel in person? - What would you ship in the first year to learn whether the long-term bet is right? - How would you keep managers from using the product to monitor attendance?

Overview: A product strategy interview prompt in which Google's CEO asks for a product that makes in-person meetings possible over the next five to ten years. It tests how a candidate interprets an ambiguous ask, picks a user segment, finds pain points, and lays out a phased roadmap with metrics and privacy risks.

Google logo
Google
Nov 5, 2024
mediumProduct ManagerOtherProduct Design & Strategy
0
0

Google's CEO asks you to create a product that makes in-person meetings possible, looking out over the next five to ten years. What would you build?

Clarifying Questions Guidance

  • Does "meetings in person" mean helping people physically get together, or making remote meetings feel as if everyone shares a room?
  • Are we focused on work meetings, such as hybrid teams and client visits, or also on friends and family?
  • Should the product extend Google products like Calendar, Maps and Meet, or can it be a new stand-alone product or device?
  • What does the CEO want from it over that horizon: Workspace growth, new revenue, or a new platform?

What a Strong Answer Covers Guidance

  • A stated interpretation of the ask, a mission, and the long-term trend that makes it worth a five-to-ten-year bet
  • A chosen user segment with reasons, and the concrete points where meeting in person fails for that segment
  • A phased roadmap from a near-term product to the long-term vision, built on what Google already owns
  • Prioritization with explicit criteria, plus a success metric and guardrails
  • Risks, especially location privacy and workplace surveillance concerns, and how they shape the design

Follow-up Questions Guidance

  • How would your answer change if the CEO meant technology that makes a remote meeting feel in person?
  • What would you ship in the first year to learn whether the long-term bet is right?
  • How would you keep managers from using the product to monitor attendance?