Lowering Amazon Associates commissions: incrementality, publisher churn and profit

Quick Overview

A pricing and strategy question on whether Amazon should lower the commissions it pays affiliate publishers for referred purchases. It tests understanding the program's economics, separating incremental sales from ones that would happen anyway, weighing savings against publisher churn and lost sales, and building a targeted, testable recommendation.

Lowering Amazon Associates commissions: incrementality, publisher churn and profit

Company: Amazon

Role: Product Manager

Category: Product / Decision Making

Difficulty: medium

Interview Round: Other

Amazon's affiliate program, Amazon Associates, pays outside publishers such as bloggers, review sites, video creators and social media influencers a commission when shoppers they send to Amazon make a purchase. The commission is a percentage of the sale, and the rate depends on the product category. Would you recommend that Amazon reduce these commission rates? Make a recommendation and walk through how you would reach it. ```hint Which sales does the money buy A lower rate saves money on a referred sale only if that sale still happens. Which referred purchases would disappear if publishers earned less, and which would happen anyway? ``` ### Clarifying Questions - What is prompting the review: a cost-reduction target, a belief that some categories are overpaid, or concern about the quality of affiliate traffic? - Must one change apply to every category, or can rates vary by category, by type of publisher or by kind of purchase? - Is ending the program an option, or only changing the rates? - What do we know about how many affiliate-referred purchases would have happened without the referral? ### What a Strong Answer Covers - How the program creates value for Amazon, publishers and shoppers, and the objective the rate decision serves. - Incrementality: separating referred sales the program truly causes from sales that would have happened anyway, by category and by publisher type. - The second-order effects of a cut: publishers leaving or steering readers to other retailers, weaker review content, and Amazon losing its place as the default link in product research. - Alternatives to a uniform cut, such as category-specific rates, tiers, rewards for new customers or tighter attribution, compared on savings and risk. - A recommendation backed by a test plan, a profit metric for the channel and guardrails on referred sales and publisher retention. ### Follow-up Questions - After a cut in one category, referred sales there fall. How would you work out whether the cut still paid off? - Rival retailers start offering publishers higher commissions. How would you keep the best publishers linking to Amazon? - Publishers compare notes with one another. How would you test a rate change without that contaminating the results?

Overview: A pricing and strategy question on whether Amazon should lower the commissions it pays affiliate publishers for referred purchases. It tests understanding the program's economics, separating incremental sales from ones that would happen anyway, weighing savings against publisher churn and lost sales, and building a targeted, testable recommendation.

Amazon logo
Amazon
May 6, 2024
mediumProduct ManagerOtherProduct / Decision Making
0
0

Amazon's affiliate program, Amazon Associates, pays outside publishers such as bloggers, review sites, video creators and social media influencers a commission when shoppers they send to Amazon make a purchase. The commission is a percentage of the sale, and the rate depends on the product category. Would you recommend that Amazon reduce these commission rates? Make a recommendation and walk through how you would reach it.

Clarifying Questions Guidance

  • What is prompting the review: a cost-reduction target, a belief that some categories are overpaid, or concern about the quality of affiliate traffic?
  • Must one change apply to every category, or can rates vary by category, by type of publisher or by kind of purchase?
  • Is ending the program an option, or only changing the rates?
  • What do we know about how many affiliate-referred purchases would have happened without the referral?

What a Strong Answer Covers Guidance

  • How the program creates value for Amazon, publishers and shoppers, and the objective the rate decision serves.
  • Incrementality: separating referred sales the program truly causes from sales that would have happened anyway, by category and by publisher type.
  • The second-order effects of a cut: publishers leaving or steering readers to other retailers, weaker review content, and Amazon losing its place as the default link in product research.
  • Alternatives to a uniform cut, such as category-specific rates, tiers, rewards for new customers or tighter attribution, compared on savings and risk.
  • A recommendation backed by a test plan, a profit metric for the channel and guardrails on referred sales and publisher retention.

Follow-up Questions Guidance

  • After a cut in one category, referred sales there fall. How would you work out whether the cut still paid off?
  • Rival retailers start offering publishers higher commissions. How would you keep the best publishers linking to Amazon?
  • Publishers compare notes with one another. How would you test a rate change without that contaminating the results?