Pinterest product improvement: choose a segment, fix its top pain point, define metrics

Quick Overview

A Pinterest product sense question that asks how to improve the product for one chosen group of users. It tests choosing a goal and segment, finding pain points in searching and saving ideas, prioritizing solutions, and defining satisfaction metrics with revenue and creator guardrails.

Pinterest product improvement: choose a segment, fix its top pain point, define metrics

Company: Pinterest

Role: Product Manager

Category: Product Design & Strategy

Difficulty: medium

Interview Round: Other

You are a product manager at Pinterest, and you are asked how you would make the product better. Choose whom the improvement is for, identify what gets in their way today, propose and prioritize solutions, and explain how you would know the change worked. ```hint Pick one reason people open Pinterest People come to Pinterest for different reasons: planning a project, learning a hobby, browsing for fun, publishing their own pins or advertising. Pick one group and follow a real session from search to save to acting on the idea; the friction you find there is a better starting point than a feature you already like. ``` ### Clarifying Questions - Which outcome matters most here: user satisfaction, engagement and retention, or revenue from ads and shopping? - Should the improvement serve the people searching for and saving ideas, or the creators and businesses who publish pins? - Is the mobile app or the website the priority surface, given that scanning a dense grid of pins feels different on each? - Are changes to search and home-feed ranking in scope, or only changes to the interface? ### What a Strong Answer Covers - A stated goal for the improvement and a reasoned choice of one user segment among the groups that use Pinterest for different reasons. - Concrete pain points for that segment, traced through a real session of searching, saving and acting on an idea, with a view on how to confirm them in data. - Several solution options prioritized by impact, effort and confidence, ending in a clear first version. - Metrics that show whether users found what they came for, rather than time spent alone, with guardrails for ad revenue, creators' traffic and spam. - Trade-offs and risks, such as changes that help one group of users while hurting browsers, creators or advertisers. ### Follow-up Questions - How would you measure satisfaction with search results directly, beyond click-through rate? - Your change raises saves but lowers clicks through to creators' websites. Is that a win? - How would you run the experiment, given that a ranking change affects users, creators and advertisers at once?

Overview: A Pinterest product sense question that asks how to improve the product for one chosen group of users. It tests choosing a goal and segment, finding pain points in searching and saving ideas, prioritizing solutions, and defining satisfaction metrics with revenue and creator guardrails.

Pinterest logo
Pinterest
May 3, 2024
mediumProduct ManagerOtherProduct Design & Strategy
0
0

You are a product manager at Pinterest, and you are asked how you would make the product better.

Choose whom the improvement is for, identify what gets in their way today, propose and prioritize solutions, and explain how you would know the change worked.

Clarifying Questions Guidance

  • Which outcome matters most here: user satisfaction, engagement and retention, or revenue from ads and shopping?
  • Should the improvement serve the people searching for and saving ideas, or the creators and businesses who publish pins?
  • Is the mobile app or the website the priority surface, given that scanning a dense grid of pins feels different on each?
  • Are changes to search and home-feed ranking in scope, or only changes to the interface?

What a Strong Answer Covers Guidance

  • A stated goal for the improvement and a reasoned choice of one user segment among the groups that use Pinterest for different reasons.
  • Concrete pain points for that segment, traced through a real session of searching, saving and acting on an idea, with a view on how to confirm them in data.
  • Several solution options prioritized by impact, effort and confidence, ending in a clear first version.
  • Metrics that show whether users found what they came for, rather than time spent alone, with guardrails for ad revenue, creators' traffic and spam.
  • Trade-offs and risks, such as changes that help one group of users while hurting browsers, creators or advertisers.

Follow-up Questions Guidance

  • How would you measure satisfaction with search results directly, beyond click-through rate?
  • Your change raises saves but lowers clicks through to creators' websites. Is that a win?
  • How would you run the experiment, given that a ranking change affects users, creators and advertisers at once?