Southern California Edison · Software Engineer
Updated · 2026-10-02

Southern California Edison Software Engineer
Interview Guide

THE 60-SECOND BRIEF

As a Software Engineer at Southern California Edison (SCE), you are at the intersection of critical infrastructure and modern technology. Your work directly supports the reliable delivery of power to millions of residents and businesses across Southern California. You are not just writing code; you are building, maintaining, and scaling the software systems that underpin the power grid, manage complex utility operations, and facilitate the transition toward a cleaner energy future. The role involves high-stakes problem solving where your contributions can impact grid safety, operational efficiency, and customer service. You will collaborate with cross-functional teams—including electrical engineers, data scientists, and operations managers—to tackle unique challenges ranging from wildfire mitigation software to advanced grid automation.

This guide is scoped to a Software Engineer candidate at Southern California Edison.

Southern California Edison candidates report 4 rounds over 3-5 weeks. The stages below are what candidates describe, not a published process.

Behavioral InterviewingSTAR Method (Situation-Task-Action-Result)Power Systems Domain Knowledge

22 min read

Browse Software Engineer questions

See the practice prompts

1Candidate experiences ↗Read their reports
16Practice promptsAcross five skill areas

As a Software Engineer at Southern California Edison (SCE), you are at the intersection of critical infrastructure and modern technology. Your work directly supports the reliable delivery of power to millions of residents and businesses across Southern California. You are not just writing code; you are building, maintaining, and scaling the software systems that underpin the power grid, manage complex utility operations, and facilitate the transition toward a cleaner energy future. The role involves high-stakes problem solving where your contributions can impact grid safety, operational efficiency, and customer service. You will collaborate with cross-functional teams—including electrical engineers, data scientists, and operations managers—to tackle unique challenges ranging from wildfire mitigation software to advanced grid automation. This position offers the rare opportunity to apply software engineering rigor to physical systems, making it a highly influential role within the company. ##### Tip While technical prowess is essential, SCE values candidates who understand how their software impacts the physical world. Be prepared to discuss how your technical solutions serve the broader mission of safety and grid reliability.

01

Initial Screening

reported

Starts with a personality or technical assessment to evaluate basic qualifications.

What to demonstrate

  • Starts with a personality or technical assessment to evaluate basic qualifications
  • Depth in Behavioral Interviewing

How to prepare

  • Be able to walk your CV end to end in two minutes, and say why this company specifically.
  • Have your salary expectations, notice period and location constraints ready, and ask for the rest of the loop in writing.
Southern California Edison Software Engineer candidate reports ↗
02

Panel Interviews

reported

One or more rounds of interviews conducted by panels of 3–4 people, including hiring managers and peer engineers.

What to demonstrate

  • One or more rounds of interviews conducted by panels of 3–4 people
  • Including hiring managers and peer engineers

How to prepare

  • Answer aloud and timed: How do you handle situations where you are wrong about a technical calculation or design decision?
  • Answer aloud and timed: Give an example of a time you had to think on your feet to solve a difficult problem.
Southern California Edison Software Engineer candidate reports ↗
03

Behavioral Assessment

reported

Focus on assessing how candidates fit into the existing team culture using the STAR method.

What to demonstrate

  • Focus on assessing how candidates fit into the existing team culture using the STAR method
  • Depth in Behavioral Interviewing

How to prepare

  • Prepare three examples from your own work, each with a decision you made and an outcome you can quantify.
  • Re-read the description of the behavioral assessment above and write down what you would ask to confirm before it.
Southern California Edison Software Engineer candidate reports ↗
04

Technical Evaluation

reported

Prepare for potential 'whiteboard-style' or design-based questions during the final stages.

What to demonstrate

  • Prepare for potential 'whiteboard-style' or design-based questions during the final stages
  • Depth in Behavioral Interviewing

How to prepare

  • Answer aloud and timed: What are the fundamental differences between a fuse and a circuit breaker?
  • Answer aloud and timed: Can you explain your experience with database design (SQL/Oracle) and why it is critical for utility systems?
Southern California Edison Software Engineer candidate reports ↗

1 candidate reports. Individual accounts describe a particular role and hiring cycle.

Software Engineer

Southern California Edison Software Engineer interview: STAR panel and electrical concepts

Technical Screen

I started with a talent-acquisition recruiter call. Because I matched the role requirements, I moved to a four-person panel interview. They took turns asking questions, so the conversation was structured but moved quickly as each interviewer joined in. Most questions were behavioral and expected STAR-style answers. I was pressed about past experience and how I handled particular situations, with…

Read full experience

PracHub editorial advice for the preparation topics above.

01

Research the company mission

Understand how Southern California Edison serves its customers and the challenges of the modern power grid.

02

Practice the STAR method

Do not just tell a story; structure it with a clear Situation, Task, Action, and Result to ensure you hit all the points interviewers are grading.

03

Prepare for panel dynamics

You may be interviewed by multiple people at once. Maintain eye contact with the person who asked the question, but acknowledge the rest of the panel during your response.

04

Some assessments used by SCE are pass/fail and can have a waiting period of up to 6 months if you do not pass

Take these assessments seriously and ensure you have a quiet, uninterrupted hour to complete them.

Choose a category, try a prompt, then open its approach, worked solution or follow-up when you need it.

9 technical prompts0 include a worked solution

Find overlapping job attempts and peak concurrency from lease records

medium
sweep lineintervalsleases

A day of job_run history yields about 50,000,000 attempt records: (job_run_id, job_type, attempt, started_at, finished_at which is NULL when the worker died, lease_expires_at). Leases expire on a clock, so a job that outran its lease ran twice. Produce (a) every job_run_id whose attempts overlapped in wall-clock time and (b) the peak number of simultaneously running attempts per job_type with the minute it occurred. Target O(n log n). State how you treat a NULL finished_at and what clock skew does to your answer.

Approach
  1. Define the interval before sorting anything: an attempt occupies [started_at, COALESCE(finished_at, lease_expires_at)). finished_at is observed and lease_expires_at is only a promise, so every attempt without a finish contributes an estimate and the whole result is a lower bound on overlap rather than an exact count.
  2. For peak concurrency, sweep: emit 2n endpoints, sort by (timestamp, kind) with ends ordered before starts at equal timestamps, then walk the sequence maintaining a counter per job_type and record each type's maximum with its timestamp. O(n log n) dominated by the sort, O(n) space, or O(1) extra if the sort is external and the walk streams.
  3. For overlap detection, do not compare attempts pairwise. A single global sort by (job_run_id, started_at) gives both the grouping and the order; within a group, keep the maximum end seen so far and report an overlap exactly when the next start is less than that running maximum, which is one linear pass after the sort.
  4. Half-open intervals matter and are easy to get wrong: with closed intervals an attempt ending at the same millisecond another begins reads as concurrency two, and across 50,000,000 records that artefact swamps the real signal.
Follow-up
  • A handler is not idempotent and you have found 400 overlapping jobs. Which of them actually caused damage, and what would you query to find out?
  • Peak concurrency for one job_type is 4 against a configured cap of 4. Is the cap working, or is the data hiding attempts that never started?

Merge partitioned event streams into one ordered feed with bounded lateness

hard
k-way mergewatermarksout-of-order streams

The read-model service consumes 64 log partitions carrying about 4,000 events per second in total. Each partition is ordered within itself, but partitions drift by up to 30 seconds, and the activity feed must present a tenant's events in occurred_at order. Produce the merge. State its complexity, the buffer it requires in events and in bytes, what happens when one partition is idle, and what you do with an event that arrives after you have already emitted its position. Payloads average 1 KB.

Approach
  1. Merge with a min-heap over the 64 partition heads keyed on (occurred_at, event_id): O(log P) per event and O(n log P) overall. The tie-break on event_id is what makes the output deterministic when two partitions carry the same millisecond, which matters because the feed is paginated and a non-deterministic order reorders pages under the reader.
  2. Emitting the heap head is only correct once every partition has produced everything up to that timestamp, so the emit condition is a watermark: the minimum across partitions of the highest occurred_at seen, less the allowed lateness. Events are held until the watermark passes them, which is what turns individually ordered streams into a jointly ordered one.
  3. Size the buffer from the lateness rather than guessing: 4,000 events per second times 30 seconds is 120,000 buffered events, and at 1 KB each about 120 MB of heap. That number is the real price of the ordering guarantee and belongs in front of whoever asked for it.
  4. Handle the idle partition explicitly, because it fails the feed rather than corrupting it: a partition with no traffic never advances its own maximum, so the watermark freezes and output stops entirely. Either every partition emits a periodic idle marker carrying the broker's current time, or the watermark falls back to wall clock for a partition silent beyond a threshold.
Follow-up
  • The lateness budget is raised to five minutes. What is the new buffer, and what besides memory changes?
  • The consumer restarts. Where does it resume from, and what does the feed look like for the first 30 seconds?

Collapse a redelivered event batch into per-aggregate high-water marks

easy
hashingat-least-onceaggregation

You drain a batch of up to 5,000,000 events, each (aggregate_id BIGINT, aggregate_version INT, event_type, payload). The log guarantees order within one aggregate only; the batch merges 64 partitions, and a relay failover has redelivered a range, so an older version for an aggregate can appear after a newer one. Given a map of last_applied_version per aggregate, produce the events worth applying, at most one per (aggregate_id, version), plus the count discarded. Target O(n) time. State the memory for 2,000,000 distinct aggregates and what you do when it does not fit.

Approach
  1. One pass, one hash map from aggregate_id to the highest version kept, and a discard counter. An event whose version is at or below last_applied_version for its aggregate is dropped without further work, which is the whole reason the event carries its version rather than a delta. O(n) expected time, O(d) space in distinct aggregates.
  2. Keep the maximum, never the last occurrence. The redelivered range means the final appearance of an aggregate in the batch can be an older version than one seen earlier in the same batch, so last-wins applies stale state over newer state and the projection regresses with no error anywhere.
  3. Cost the memory instead of calling it large: an 8-byte key plus a 4-byte version is 12 bytes of payload, and an open-addressed table held at a 0.7 load factor costs roughly 17 bytes per entry before per-slot metadata, so 2,000,000 aggregates is tens of megabytes in a native layout and several times that in a runtime that boxes both key and value.
  4. If the distinct set exceeds memory, partition on hash(aggregate_id) mod P and reduce each partition independently. Every event for one aggregate hashes to the same partition, so the per-partition result is exact and the merge is concatenation rather than a second reduction.
Follow-up
  • The payload is a patch rather than a snapshot, so applying only the highest version loses the intermediate changes. What changes in your reduction?
  • How do you detect that version 7 arrived while version 6 was never delivered, and what should the consumer do about the gap?

Built from the rounds and topics Southern California Edison candidates report.

Small steps. Visible outcomes.0 / 7 completed
ONE WEEK · YOUR PACE

Prepare, practise & reflect

One practical outcome each day. Spend longer where you need it.

0 / 7 done
01Map the Southern California Edison loop
  • Write out the reported sequence: Initial Screening, Panel Interviews, Behavioral Assessment, Technical Evaluation.
  • For each round, write one sentence on what it is judging, from the description above, and mark the one you are least ready for.

Deliverable: A one-page map of the 4 reported rounds, with the weakest marked.

02Work Behavioral Interviewing
  • Spend the session on Behavioral Interviewing, which Southern California Edison candidates report being tested on.
  • Write one worked example in Behavioral Interviewing and time yourself on it.

Deliverable: One timed worked example in Behavioral Interviewing.

03Work STAR Method (Situation-Task-Action-Result)
  • Spend the session on STAR Method (Situation-Task-Action-Result), which Southern California Edison candidates report being tested on.
  • Write one worked example in STAR Method (Situation-Task-Action-Result) and time yourself on it.

Deliverable: One timed worked example in STAR Method (Situation-Task-Action-Result).

04Work Power Systems Domain Knowledge
  • Spend the session on Power Systems Domain Knowledge, which Southern California Edison candidates report being tested on.
  • Write one worked example in Power Systems Domain Knowledge and time yourself on it.

Deliverable: One timed worked example in Power Systems Domain Knowledge.

05Answer out loud: Behavioral and Leadership
  • Answer aloud, timed: Describe a hardship you faced in a professional project and how you overcame it.
  • Answer aloud, timed: Tell me about a time you had a disagreement with a colleague; how did you resolve it?

Deliverable: Spoken answers to 2 reported Behavioral and Leadership question(s), under time.

06Answer out loud: Technical and Domain Knowledge
  • Answer aloud, timed: How would you approach preventing wildfires in relation to power lines from a software perspective?
  • Answer aloud, timed: What are the fundamental differences between a fuse and a circuit breaker?

Deliverable: Spoken answers to 2 reported Technical and Domain Knowledge question(s), under time.

07Dry run for Southern California Edison
  • Run one full mock under time, then write down the two questions you most want to ask your interviewers.

Deliverable: A completed timed mock and two questions to ask.

Expand any day for tasks and deliverables. Your progress is saved on this device.

Behavioural rounds judge the decision you made and what it cost.

Describe a hardship you faced in a professional project and how you overcame it.

medium
Behavioral and Leadership

Describe a hardship you faced in a professional project and how you overcame it.

Approach
  1. Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
  2. State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
  3. Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
  4. Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
  • What would you do differently if you ran that again?
  • How did you know your change caused the improvement?

Tell me about a time you had a disagreement with a colleague; how did you resolve it?

medium
Behavioral and Leadership

Tell me about a time you had a disagreement with a colleague; how did you resolve it?

Approach
  1. Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
  2. State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
  3. Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
  4. Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
  • What would you do differently if you ran that again?
  • How did you know your change caused the improvement?

How do you handle situations where you are wrong about a technical calculation or design decision?

medium
Behavioral and Leadership

How do you handle situations where you are wrong about a technical calculation or design decision?

Approach
  1. Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
  2. State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
  3. Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
  4. Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
  • What would you do differently if you ran that again?
  • How did you know your change caused the improvement?

Give an example of a time you had to think on your feet to solve a difficult problem.

medium
Behavioral and Leadership

Give an example of a time you had to think on your feet to solve a difficult problem.

Approach
  1. Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
  2. State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
  3. Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
  4. Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
  • What would you do differently if you ran that again?
  • How did you know your change caused the improvement?

Why do you want to work for Southern California Edison?

medium
Behavioral and Leadership

Why do you want to work for Southern California Edison?

Approach
  1. Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
  2. State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
  3. Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
  4. Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
  • What would you do differently if you ran that again?
  • How did you know your change caused the improvement?

Can you explain your experience with database design (SQL/Oracle) and why it is critical for utility systems?

medium
Technical and Domain Knowledge

Can you explain your experience with database design (SQL/Oracle) and why it is critical for utility systems?

Approach
  1. Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
  2. State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
  3. Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
  4. Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
  • What would you do differently if you ran that again?
  • How did you know your change caused the improvement?

Describe your experience with specific programming languages like Java or Python in a professional setting.

medium
Technical and Domain Knowledge

Describe your experience with specific programming languages like Java or Python in a professional setting.

Approach
  1. Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
  2. State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
  3. Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
  4. Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
  • What would you do differently if you ran that again?
  • How did you know your change caused the improvement?
  • 01

    Describe a hardship you faced in a professional project and how you overcame it.

  • 02

    Tell me about a time you had a disagreement with a colleague; how did you resolve it?

  • 03

    How do you handle situations where you are wrong about a technical calculation or design decision?

  • 04

    Give an example of a time you had to think on your feet to solve a difficult problem.

PracHub preparation framework ↗
How long is the typical interview process?

The process can range from a few weeks to a couple of months. While some stages move quickly, the overall timeline is deliberate to ensure the right team fit.

Southern California Edison Software Engineer candidate reports ↗
Are technical questions always included?

Not always. Many candidates report purely behavioral interviews, but you should always be prepared for at least one technical or design-related question, especially if the role is highly specialized.

Southern California Edison Software Engineer candidate reports ↗
What is the best way to prepare for the personality assessment?

Research the company’s core values—safety, integrity, and excellence. Answer consistently and honestly, as these tests are designed to measure alignment with the organizational culture.

Southern California Edison Software Engineer candidate reports ↗
Can I expect a remote interview?

Yes, most initial rounds and many panel interviews are conducted via Microsoft Teams, though some roles may eventually require in-person attendance depending on the department.

Southern California Edison Software Engineer candidate reports ↗
What topics does Southern California Edison test in interviews?

Southern California Edison interviews most often cover Behavioral Interviewing, Phone Screening, Problem Solving, Panel Interviewing, and Cybersecurity (General). The exact emphasis depends on the specific role you apply for.

Southern California Edison Software Engineer candidate reports ↗
Sources & methodology 3 sources ↗

No official company page is cited. Rounds and questions come from candidate reports and PracHub editorial material; each source shows the date it was read.