Design a pricing experiment with network effects

Read the full interview experience this question came from →

Quick Overview

This question evaluates experimental design and causal inference competencies for a two-sided marketplace pricing change, including handling network effects/interference, choice of unit of randomization and treatment markets, metric selection and diagnostics, power/MDE estimation, and operational risk assessment within the Analytics & Experimentation domain for a Data Scientist role. It is commonly asked to assess practical application of randomized and quasi-experimental methods across heterogeneous geographies and operational constraints, requiring both hands-on experimental design skills and conceptual understanding of bias, spillovers, and diagnostic metrics.

Design a pricing experiment with network effects

Company: Instacart

Role: Data Scientist

Category: Analytics & Experimentation

Difficulty: easy

Interview Round: Technical Screen

## Scenario You want to launch a **new pricing model** that incentivizes shoppers to place/pick up more orders during **rush hours** in a two-sided marketplace (supply and demand interact). You suspect **network effects / interference**: changing prices for some users may affect availability, ETAs, or acceptance rates for others. ## Task Design an experiment to evaluate the new pricing model. ### Constraints - A standard user-level A/B test may be invalid due to **spillovers** (interference) across users. - The marketplace has heterogeneous geographies with different baselines. ### Requirements Your design should include: 1. **Unit of randomization** and why (e.g., geo/market-level). 2. How you will choose **treatment/control markets** (e.g., matched pairs / lookalikes). 3. **Primary metric** (north star) and a set of diagnostic + guardrail metrics. 4. How you handle **bias/confounding** (seasonality, pre-trends, market differences). 5. Ramp plan, duration, and how you’ll estimate power/MDE at a high level. 6. Risks: spillovers across nearby markets, partial compliance, concurrent changes. ### Output Provide a clear experimental plan and analysis approach (e.g., difference-in-differences).

Overview: This question evaluates experimental design and causal inference competencies for a two-sided marketplace pricing change, including handling network effects/interference, choice of unit of randomization and treatment markets, metric selection and diagnostics, power/MDE estimation, and operational risk assessment within the Analytics & Experimentation domain for a Data Scientist role. It is commonly asked to assess practical application of randomized and quasi-experimental methods across heterogeneous geographies and operational constraints, requiring both hands-on experimental design skills and conceptual understanding of bias, spillovers, and diagnostic metrics.

Read the full Instacart Data Scientist interview experience this question came from

Instacart logo
Instacart
Feb 6, 2026
easyData ScientistTechnical ScreenAnalytics & Experimentation
30
0

Scenario

You want to launch a new pricing model that incentivizes shoppers to place/pick up more orders during rush hours in a two-sided marketplace (supply and demand interact). You suspect network effects / interference: changing prices for some users may affect availability, ETAs, or acceptance rates for others.

Task

Design an experiment to evaluate the new pricing model.

Constraints

  • A standard user-level A/B test may be invalid due to spillovers (interference) across users.
  • The marketplace has heterogeneous geographies with different baselines.

Requirements

Your design should include:

  1. Unit of randomization and why (e.g., geo/market-level).
  2. How you will choose treatment/control markets (e.g., matched pairs / lookalikes).
  3. Primary metric (north star) and a set of diagnostic + guardrail metrics.
  4. How you handle bias/confounding (seasonality, pre-trends, market differences).
  5. Ramp plan, duration, and how you’ll estimate power/MDE at a high level.
  6. Risks: spillovers across nearby markets, partial compliance, concurrent changes.

Output

Provide a clear experimental plan and analysis approach (e.g., difference-in-differences).