Redesign the Traveler Journey Through Airport Screening Checkpoints

Quick Overview

A product improvement exercise about making airport security screening less stressful for travelers. It tests choosing a traveler segment, mapping the checkpoint journey, prioritizing solutions that keep security intact, and defining experience metrics with security and throughput guardrails.

Redesign the Traveler Journey Through Airport Screening Checkpoints

Company: Google

Role: Product Manager

Category: Product Design & Strategy

Difficulty: medium

Interview Round: Other

Your task is to make going through security at an airport a better experience. Decide whose experience you are improving and at which kind of airport, find the problems that matter most to them, propose solutions, and explain how you would measure whether the change worked. ```hint Walk the checkpoint step by step Break the checkpoint into stages, from deciding when to leave for the airport to repacking after the scanner, and look for the stage and traveler group where stress and delay pile up, rather than trying to fix every step at once. ``` ### Clarifying Questions - Whose experience matters here: travelers, screening officers or the airport operator? - Which airports and trips: a large international hub or a small regional airport, and departing travelers only, or also connecting travelers who are screened again? - Can the screening rules themselves change, or must the solution work within the rules the security agency sets? - Is the solution expected to be digital, a physical change to the checkpoint, or either? ### What a Strong Answer Covers - A clear goal and a chosen traveler segment, justified against others such as frequent flyers, families, travelers with disabilities and connecting passengers. - A map of the checkpoint journey with pain points ranked by how often they occur and how much they hurt. - Solutions that never trade away security effectiveness, prioritized by impact and by how much cooperation from airports and agencies they need. - A traveler-experience north star with guardrails on security outcomes and lane throughput. - Risks such as privacy of identity data, accessibility, and dependence on agency adoption. ### Follow-up Questions - How would you persuade a government screening agency to adopt your idea? - If publishing live wait times made many travelers arrive at the same time and lines grew at peaks, what would you change? - How would your design change for a traveler who is blind or has low vision?

Overview: A product improvement exercise about making airport security screening less stressful for travelers. It tests choosing a traveler segment, mapping the checkpoint journey, prioritizing solutions that keep security intact, and defining experience metrics with security and throughput guardrails.

Google logo
Google
Mar 14, 2026
mediumProduct ManagerOtherProduct Design & Strategy
0
0

Your task is to make going through security at an airport a better experience. Decide whose experience you are improving and at which kind of airport, find the problems that matter most to them, propose solutions, and explain how you would measure whether the change worked.

Clarifying Questions Guidance

  • Whose experience matters here: travelers, screening officers or the airport operator?
  • Which airports and trips: a large international hub or a small regional airport, and departing travelers only, or also connecting travelers who are screened again?
  • Can the screening rules themselves change, or must the solution work within the rules the security agency sets?
  • Is the solution expected to be digital, a physical change to the checkpoint, or either?

What a Strong Answer Covers Guidance

  • A clear goal and a chosen traveler segment, justified against others such as frequent flyers, families, travelers with disabilities and connecting passengers.
  • A map of the checkpoint journey with pain points ranked by how often they occur and how much they hurt.
  • Solutions that never trade away security effectiveness, prioritized by impact and by how much cooperation from airports and agencies they need.
  • A traveler-experience north star with guardrails on security outcomes and lane throughput.
  • Risks such as privacy of identity data, accessibility, and dependence on agency adoption.

Follow-up Questions Guidance

  • How would you persuade a government screening agency to adopt your idea?
  • If publishing live wait times made many travelers arrive at the same time and lines grew at peaks, what would you change?
  • How would your design change for a traveler who is blind or has low vision?