Should Google Enter Premium Video Streaming? Go or No-Go Call and a Plan to Compete

Quick Overview

A product strategy question asking whether Google should launch a video streaming service against Netflix, Disney+, Prime Video and Hulu, and how it would compete if so. It tests analysis of subscription streaming economics, an honest view of Google's advantages and gaps, a clear go or no-go call, and a concrete strategy with metrics and risks.

Should Google Enter Premium Video Streaming? Go or No-Go Call and a Plan to Compete

Company: Google

Role: Product Manager

Category: Product Design & Strategy

Difficulty: medium

Interview Round: Other

Established subscription streaming services such as Netflix, Disney+, Prime Video and Hulu compete for people who pay to watch movies and TV series. Should Google build its own video streaming service to take them on? If you decide that it should, lay out the strategy you would follow. ```hint What would Google add Google already reaches enormous video audiences. Before deciding, work out what a new service would give viewers that they cannot already get, and what Google would need to win that it does not have today. ``` ### Clarifying Questions - Does "build a streaming service" mean a new standalone subscription brand with its own library, or may the answer build on YouTube and Google's other video products? - What should the service do for Google: earn subscription revenue, grow ad revenue, win time on the TV screen, or support Google's devices and TV platform? - Which market comes first: the US, where these four services are strongest, or a global launch? - Is buying a studio or an existing service in scope, or only building? ### What a Strong Answer Covers - A clear go or no-go decision on a head-to-head service, with the reasons. - How the subscription streaming market works: what wins subscribers, what content costs, how crowded the field is and how viewers move between services. - Google's specific advantages and gaps in this market, including the risk of drawing viewers away from YouTube. - Distinct strategic options compared on explicit criteria, leading to a chosen strategy that covers differentiation, content, business model and launch. - Metrics, risks and the milestones that would justify continuing or stopping the investment. ### Follow-up Questions - The studios behind rival services also advertise on YouTube and license content to Google. How does your strategy affect those relationships? - How would your answer change if Google had the chance to buy a major studio? - Two years in, what results would make you double the investment, and what would make you stop?

Overview: A product strategy question asking whether Google should launch a video streaming service against Netflix, Disney+, Prime Video and Hulu, and how it would compete if so. It tests analysis of subscription streaming economics, an honest view of Google's advantages and gaps, a clear go or no-go call, and a concrete strategy with metrics and risks.

Google logo
Google
May 13, 2024
mediumProduct ManagerOtherProduct Design & Strategy
0
0

Established subscription streaming services such as Netflix, Disney+, Prime Video and Hulu compete for people who pay to watch movies and TV series. Should Google build its own video streaming service to take them on? If you decide that it should, lay out the strategy you would follow.

Clarifying Questions Guidance

  • Does "build a streaming service" mean a new standalone subscription brand with its own library, or may the answer build on YouTube and Google's other video products?
  • What should the service do for Google: earn subscription revenue, grow ad revenue, win time on the TV screen, or support Google's devices and TV platform?
  • Which market comes first: the US, where these four services are strongest, or a global launch?
  • Is buying a studio or an existing service in scope, or only building?

What a Strong Answer Covers Guidance

  • A clear go or no-go decision on a head-to-head service, with the reasons.
  • How the subscription streaming market works: what wins subscribers, what content costs, how crowded the field is and how viewers move between services.
  • Google's specific advantages and gaps in this market, including the risk of drawing viewers away from YouTube.
  • Distinct strategic options compared on explicit criteria, leading to a chosen strategy that covers differentiation, content, business model and launch.
  • Metrics, risks and the milestones that would justify continuing or stopping the investment.

Follow-up Questions Guidance

  • The studios behind rival services also advertise on YouTube and license content to Google. How does your strategy affect those relationships?
  • How would your answer change if Google had the chance to buy a major studio?
  • Two years in, what results would make you double the investment, and what would make you stop?