I began with a recruiter-style interaction. About a week later, I took a test that leaned heavily on aptitude and felt tricky. It seemed to judge more than experience. Even with a background, there was a clear emphasis on reasoning and aptitude questions. The sequence felt structured and demanding from the start.
After the aptitude round came a group discussion, where communication and confidence mattered, then technical rounds and finally an HR round. The technical part did more than check fundamentals. Its questions pushed my reasoning under pressure, which made the process feel difficult rather than simply technical. By the end, I could tell the company put a lot of weight on problem-solving and mental agility, not only what was on my resume.
I did not receive an offer. What caught me off guard was how much aptitude and tricky questioning appeared alongside the technical evaluation.
Location: Hyderābād. Overall feedback: negative. Offer status: no offer.
Discussion
Loading comments…