Canonical Software Engineer interview with a long written stage

Canonical·Software Engineer·Reported Apr 2026
Online AssessmentHard

I interviewed for a Software Engineer role, and the overall experience felt extremely punishing. It started with an unusually long, essay-style written stage, followed by aptitude and other tests, and ended with a slow or non-specific rejection.

For the written interview, or long questionnaire, I answered extensive essay-style questions about my background. They often asked for school-related details and required very long responses. I then took time-pressured cognitive-style tasks along with reaction and logic questions.

I also completed an online technical assessment on a third-party testing site. In my case, it was glitchy and buggy. Before reaching interviews, I went through additional screening steps that felt redundant or poorly aligned with the role.

At the final stage, I was either declined after a late step with little to no feedback, or the communication simply went silent for weeks. I didn’t get an offer. The written-and-testing funnel felt oversized, and the communication was inconsistent.

Location: United States. Overall feedback: Negative. Offer status: No offer.

Published

Curated and edited by PracHub

Discussion

Sign in to join the discussion. The author is notified of every comment.

Loading comments…

Interview at a glance

Company
Canonical
Role
Software Engineer
Rounds
Online Assessment
Difficulty
Hard
Date
Reported Apr 2026

Real Canonical interview experiences

First-hand reports from Canonical candidates — the rounds, the questions they were asked, and how it went.

All 8 Canonical interview experiences