My process started with online aptitude and personality testing, followed by a behavioral evaluation and a one-way video interview where I recorded answers to a prompt. After those early steps, I was invited to an in-person onsite sequence with multiple parts.
In the later rounds, the technical work shifted toward live problem solving and deeper evaluation. I worked through standard algorithmic coding tasks, then moved into design and leadership discussions depending on the stage. The difficulty varied, but the interviews were spread across multiple days. Feedback sometimes came promptly after the sessions.
The earlier stages had some awkwardness, especially the one-way behavioral format. The later rounds felt smoother and more constructive. I didn’t get an offer in every path I took through the process, but the sequence itself was coherent: cognitive screening first, then video, followed by deeper technical and behavioral rounds that felt more conversational and less automated.
Location: United States. Overall feedback: Neutral. Offer status: No offer.
Discussion
Loading comments…